Moms for Liberty Tanked at the Polls. This Guy Called It.
Nov 20, 2023
auto_awesome
Adam Laat, Professor of Education and History at Binghamton University, discusses the recent loss of ultra-conservative 'parental rights candidates' in school board elections. The podcast explores the historical context of the fight for conservative control of public schools, the messy state of America's school politics, and why conservative concern about public education is a recurring cycle.
Conservative candidates endorsed by parental rights groups pushing for book bans and LGBTQ+ topic restrictions performed poorly in recent school board elections, indicating that voters tend to reject accusations against public schools when given the chance to examine their accuracy.
Despite recent conservative efforts to control public schools, they have historically been unsuccessful as public schools tend to avoid controversy and align with mainstream ideas, maintaining broad public trust as traditional institutions.
Deep dives
Conservative ideas losing at the ballot box
Conservative educational ideas seemed to lose in recent elections, with progressive candidates winning school board seats. Parental rights groups endorsed candidates who pushed for book bans and barring teaching about LGBTQ+ topics, but these candidates performed poorly. Historian Adam Lots argues that when given the chance to examine the accusations against public schools, voters tend to reject them because they are not accurate. He cites West Virginia as an example, where a fight over a multicultural curriculum in 1974 led to the election of middle-of-the-road candidates, signaling a rejection of conservative control.
Conservatives' retreat in controlling public schools
Adam Lots explains that conservative attempts to control public schools date back to the 1920s but were ultimately unsuccessful. The fights were mainly over controversial issues like the teaching of evolution, but conservatives were not able to gain long-term control. In contrast, public schools tend to avoid controversy and generally align with mainstream ideas. Despite recent conservative efforts and the political potency of parents' rights, public schools are still seen as traditional institutions with broad public trust.
Impact of stress and political empowerment
The recent wave of conservative activism around parental rights and control of public schools was fueled by both stress and empowerment. The pandemic created unprecedented challenges for the education system, leading to anger and frustration among parents, teachers, and administrators. Additionally, the election of a president who echoed conservative slogans further empowered this movement. However, Adam Lots believes that these fights will ultimately lead to a period of cleanup and sorting through the wreckage. Public schools, with their tradition of avoiding controversy, will likely return to a more stable and trusted state as parents realize that they can trust their local schools and teachers to provide a good education.
Over the past few years, ultra-conservative activists took aim at school boards, trying to shape curriculums to match their beliefs. But this year, from Pennsylvania to Iowa, “parental rights candidates” lost handily. What happened?
Guest: Adam Laats, Professor of Education and History at Binghamton University.
If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.