AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Jon Shames, Senior Partner and Leader of the EY Geostrategic Business Group, joins Winna Brown to explore why PE must embed geostrategy in both deal lifecycle and organizational culture to recognize unique opportunities and drive investment decisions.
Visit ey.com to read our latest private equity perspectives.
The geopolitical landscape is shaped by four disruptive forces: globalization, technology, demographics and the environment. Private equity firms need geostrategy to manage a shifting political environment with the objective of finding opportunity amid geopolitical risk. It is necessary to develop a culture in which these considerations are explored, resourced and incorporated into all steps of deal flow, ESG and LP relationships.
A geostrategy is a powerful way for private equity firms to differentiate themselves and win in the market. Some PE funds have a more sophisticated and proactive approach to geostrategy while others are more reactive and ad-hoc: whatever the chosen approach, there is ample room for PE to further embed geostrategy into investment committee decisions.
Geopolitics shouldn’t just be about risk and worrying about the downside: it should be about driving the investment strategy from a proactive, informed perspective that yields unique opportunities that may not have otherwise been considered. It’s also about making sure a deal makes sense given the complexity of risk in the current geopolitical and broader ESG environment.
A successful geostrategic framework should follow:
Five key geostrategic practices PE executives can adopt: