Issues, Etc. A Historian’s Perspective on the Resurrection of Christ – Dr. Paul Maier, 4/21/25 (1112, Encore)
Apr 20, 2025
In this engaging discussion, Dr. Paul Maier, a renowned Professor of Ancient History at Western Michigan University and author, shares his insights on the resurrection of Christ. He dives into the historical context and evidence surrounding Easter, tackling theories like the 'stolen body' argument. Maier highlights the critical role of women as witnesses to the resurrection, emphasizing how their testimonies lend credibility to the narrative. The conversation also reflects on the deeper theological implications of the resurrection and its lasting significance in history.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Roman Death Certainty and Empty Tomb
- The Roman practice of thoroughly ensuring death by crucifixion negates the theory that Jesus never died and left the tomb on his own.
- The empty tomb is an essential historical fact and the starting point for any resurrection claim.
Criterion of Embarrassment Supports Empty Tomb
- The criterion of embarrassment strengthens the historical validity of the empty tomb because opponents admitted the tomb was empty.
- This hostile concession confirms the empty tomb is historically reliable.
Countering the Stolen Body Theory
- Reject stolen body claims by questioning who had the motive and ability to steal Jesus’ body amid heavy security.
- Emphasize the disciples’ fear and lack of incentive immediately after the crucifixion to fabricate such a deception.