

Ep. 373: Michael Walzer on Just Wars (Part One)
Aug 11, 2025
Explore the moral justifications for war with Michael Walzer's insights on self-defense versus aggression. The conversation navigates the complexities of Just War Theory in modern contexts, like the Israel-Palestine conflict. Delve into philosophical dilemmas surrounding state sovereignty, individual rights, and the ethical implications of aggression. Learn about the legalist paradigms that govern warfare and the challenges of enforcing justice in international relations, all while emphasizing the balance between realism and moral values.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Exceptions Risk Becoming Excuses For War
- The hosts warn that exceptions to the legalist rule can be abused by aggressors as pretexts for conquest.
- They cite Hitler's Sudetenland claim as a paradigmatic misuse of humanitarian rhetoric.
Territory And Sovereignty As Collective Rights
- The hosts explain the domestic analogy: states hold collective rights similar to individuals.
- Those core rights are territorial integrity and protection of sovereignty, which ground just self-defense.
Aggression Targets Political Autonomy
- The panel stresses aggression is not merely border-crossing but violation of political autonomy.
- Territorial boundaries symbolically represent a people's self-determination and common life.