Amarica's Constitution

Speaking the Law

8 snips
Jul 9, 2025
The discussion tackles the Supreme Court's handling of the birthright citizenship case and the implications of recent nationwide injunctions. Legal experts dive into the complexities of judicial decision-making, especially regarding impeachment and constitutional violations. They explore innovative legal strategies for class action lawsuits and analyze universal injunctions' impact on judicial processes. Historical context and the need for clarity in Supreme Court remedies are also emphasized, alongside significant upcoming commemorative events.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Unconstitutional

  • The Trump executive order on birthright citizenship is flagrantly unconstitutional and violates longstanding constitutional law and statute.
  • Lower federal courts uniformly agree it's clearly unconstitutional and so do many legal scholars across the spectrum.
INSIGHT

Supreme Court Avoids Merits

  • The Supreme Court avoided ruling on the constitutional merits of the birthright citizenship issue.
  • They focused on procedural questions around nationwide injunctions instead of addressing the core constitutional question.
ADVICE

Treat Citizenship Cases as Emergencies

  • The Supreme Court could have expedited briefing and issued a swift decision on the constitutional merits.
  • Courts should treat questions affecting citizenship as emergencies due to their life-or-death importance.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app