AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Space suits are kept at lower pressure than spacecraft to make it easier to bend and operate inside. Increasing oxygen concentration in space suits can be risky due to past tragedies related to pure oxygen environments.
The challenges of living in space include radiation exposure, bone loss, muscle degradation, fluid shifts in the body, and lack of trauma medicine. Long-term effects on human biology in space are largely unknown.
The idea of sexual activities in space has been considered feasible, but concerns arise regarding pregnancy and childbirth. Developmental challenges in space include fetal growth under different gravitational conditions, with little data on potential long-term effects.
The potential benefits of space settlement include personal choice analogous to a 'hot tub' decision and a long-term vision of creating a 'cathedral of survival' for humanity. However, ethical considerations regarding experiments on babies and potential genetic impacts raise critical concerns.
The unique challenges of space environments include microgravity effects on bones and muscles, radiation exposure, fluid shifts in the body, and the need for careful handling of pregnancy, childbirth, and child development. Lack of substantial research data presents significant hurdles for long-term human habitation in space.
Reproduction in space poses significant ethical concerns, with human development requiring extended research due to child maturation needing time for experimentation. The lack of a comprehensive textbook for space physiology indicates a vast array of experimental results over decades.
Mars is often considered a potential settlement location due to its relatively better conditions compared to other planets like Mercury and Venus. Challenges such as thin atmospheres causing dust storms, high surface temperature, and the presence of substances like prochlorates pose obstacles for long-term human habitation.
Space law, as established by the Outer Space Treaty, prohibits sovereignty claims in space, aiming to maintain a conflict-free environment. The lack of legal framework for territorial claims in space reduces the likelihood of interplanetary conflicts but raises challenges in governance and resource management.
Establishing a robust governance structure for space settlements is crucial to address potential challenges like labor exploitation, power concentration, and sociological norms. Drawing from existing literature on company towns and communes, proposals for space settlements should be informed by sociological and economic insights to mitigate risks and prioritize fair and equitable systems.
Modeling space governance after the International Seabed Authority's approach could offer a framework for sustainable resource allocation and exploitation in space. This would involve a system where companies petition for rights to explore and extract resources, similar to the Law of the Sea, with considerations for equitable distribution and environmental protection.
Anticipating future space settlement scenarios, concerns about digital minds in space, and potential territorial claims highlight the importance of addressing governance issues early on. Setting up systems to handle property rights, labor regulations, and ethical guidelines for space colonization can shape a more sustainable and equitable space-faring future.
Different legal regimes for space, like the ISA, Antarctic Treaty System, and the Law of the Sea, aim to prevent conflicts and maintain peace by regulating space activities without claiming territory, ensuring sustainability and avoiding exploitation.
The podcast discusses the concept of the tragedy of the commons in space, where resources may be overexploited if not managed properly. Ways to address this include regulating resource usage and setting limits to ensure sustainability and prevent individuals from causing harm for personal gain.
"Earth economists, when they measure how bad the potential for exploitation is, they look at things like, how is labour mobility? How much possibility do labourers have otherwise to go somewhere else? Well, if you are on the one company town on Mars, your labour mobility is zero, which has never existed on Earth. Even in your stereotypical West Virginian company town run by immigrant labour, there’s still, by definition, a train out. On Mars, you might not even be in the launch window. And even if there are five other company towns or five other settlements, they’re not necessarily rated to take more humans. They have their own oxygen budget, right?
"And so economists use numbers like these, like labour mobility, as a way to put an equation and estimate the ability of a company to set noncompetitive wages or to set noncompetitive work conditions. And essentially, on Mars you’re setting it to infinity." — Zach Weinersmith
In today’s episode, host Luisa Rodriguez speaks to Zach Weinersmith — the cartoonist behind Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal — about the latest book he wrote with his wife Kelly: A City on Mars: Can We Settle Space, Should We Settle Space, and Have We Really Thought This Through?
Links to learn more, highlights, and full transcript.
They cover:
Chapters:
Producer and editor: Keiran Harris
Audio engineering lead: Ben Cordell
Technical editing: Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic Armstrong
Additional content editing: Katy Moore and Luisa Rodriguez
Transcriptions: Katy Moore
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode