Good in Theory: A Political Philosophy Podcast 2 - Plato’s Apology 2: Free Speech Hero?
May 11, 2020
Socrates insults his jury and challenges them to sentence him to death, defending his commitment to truth. The podcast explores the accusations against Socrates and his defense centered around philosophy. It also discusses the absurdity of the accusation of corrupting the youth and analyzes the defiance of the defendant during the trial. Additionally, the podcast mentions how the story of Socrates has been adapted in popular culture, with 'Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure' being highlighted as an example.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Socrates as City’s Gadfly
- Socrates insists that philosophy and speaking truth are not crimes, even if they upset people.
- He compares himself to a gadfly stinging a noble but sleepy horse, urging Athenians to care about their souls, not just money or bodies.
No Plea for Pity
- Socrates provides a strong rational defense but chooses not to appeal emotionally to the jury.
- He openly insults the jury, refusing to beg or seek pity, challenging their judicial role.
Critique of Athenian Justice
- Socrates critiques Athenian justice for valuing emotion and rumor over reason and fact.
- He claims the jury bases decisions on irrelevant factors like resentment and theatrics rather than true justice.