Madison's Notes S4 E21 Congressional Deliberation: A Conversation with Kevin J. Burns and Jordan T. Cash
9 snips
Jan 15, 2025 In this conversation, Professors Kevin J. Burns, an expert in political science, and Jordan T. Cash, a scholar of political theory, delve into their book on congressional deliberation. They discuss significant historical debates and the contrasting deliberative styles of the House and Senate. The dynamic between congressional authority and presidential power, especially regarding treaty-making, is explored through Woodrow Wilson's controversial strategies. They also unpack the role of Congress in interpreting the Constitution and highlight landmark Supreme Court cases that affect legislative accountability.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
House vs. Senate Deliberation
- The House’s larger size and shorter terms make it more responsive to public opinion.
- The Senate’s smaller size and longer terms allow for more deliberation and long-term thinking.
Representation and the Nature of the Union
- Debates on representation in Congress reflected the tension between a national government and a confederation of states.
- The House’s structure prioritized popular involvement, while the Senate’s structure aimed to balance state and national interests.
Founding Fathers as Governors
- Founding fathers like Madison and Hamilton transitioned from designing the government to governing within it.
- While some founders excelled in both roles, others like Sam Adams struggled to adapt to practical politics.