AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
In this episode, the podcast explores Justice Clarence Thomas' legal philosophy and focuses on his dissents and concurrences, where his extreme views are revealed. It is highlighted that Thomas often positions himself to the right of the court's conservative majority, using his writings to put forth legal theories that eventually become law. Specific examples are mentioned, such as Thomas' belief that the accused have no right to competent representation, that students are essentially prisoners of their schools, and that it's acceptable to exclude black people from juries. The episode emphasizes the importance of understanding the radical nature of Thomas' jurisprudence, which can sometimes be overshadowed by his ethical controversies.