Cristina Quinn chats with Alex Keyssar, a historian at the Harvard Kennedy School and author of "The Right to Vote." They dive into the founding fathers' compromises that birthed the complicated Electoral College system, rather than a direct popular vote. Keyssar highlights the influence of the Three-fifths Compromise, the evolution of political parties, and how significant historical events like the end of slavery shaped today's electoral framework. Discover the intricacies of this pivotal aspect of U.S. democracy!
The compromise that established the Electoral College was influenced by debates on state representation and the Three-fifths Compromise.
The evolution of the electoral process revealed flaws in early systems, prompting changes such as the Twelfth Amendment to improve presidential elections.
Deep dives
Historical Foundations of the Electoral College
The origins of the Electoral College are rooted in the debates of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where the founding fathers faced the challenge of electing a president without prior models to follow. Initially, there was considerable support for Congress selecting the executive; however, concerns arose about maintaining the separation of powers, leading to the rejection of that idea. After extensive debate and numerous straw votes, a committee was formed to determine how to select the president, resulting in the compromise that established the Electoral College. The committee decided to allocate electors based on state populations, incorporating the controversial Three-fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person to determine representation, significantly impacting the system's foundation and dynamics.
Evolution of Voting Procedures
Initially, the process for electing a president involved the candidate with the most electoral votes becoming president and the runner-up serving as vice president, leading to contentious outcomes and political tensions. The elections of 1796 and 1800 highlighted the flaws in this system, resulting in the Twelfth Amendment of 1804, which mandated separate ballots for president and vice president to avoid conflicts between party members. Over the following decades, states experimented with various methods of selecting their electors, transitioning towards a popular vote and eventually adopting a winner-take-all system by the 1824 election. This evolution in voting procedures shaped the way presidential elections are conducted today, despite ongoing debates surrounding electoral reforms.
Ongoing Challenges and Reforms in Voting Rights
The construction of the Electoral College and its subsequent adaptations have had lasting implications on voting rights in the United States, with the parameters set by states leading to significant disenfranchisement of marginalized groups. The removal of the Three-fifths Compromise was an important step in recognizing the rights of formerly enslaved individuals, but substantial barriers to voting persisted until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 addressed many of these issues. Despite these advancements, contemporary challenges continue to affect citizens' ability to vote, drawing attention to the complexities of electoral reforms and the debate over the efficacy of the current system. The ongoing efforts by voting rights advocates underscore the importance of ensuring equal access and representation for all Americans in the democratic process.
In the second class in our series about how the electoral college works, host Cristina Quinn talks to historian Alex Keyssar of the Harvard Kennedy School about the compromises that drove the Founding Fathers to land on a complex, winner-takes-all system rather than a straightforward popular vote.
Keyssar walks listeners through the evolution of our voting system in the years following the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, and how things like electoral vote ties, the introduction of political parties and the end of slavery eventually led to the version of the voting system we have today.