391. Guidelines: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure – Question #35 with Dr. Mark Drazner

A 50-year-old woman with a history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obstructive sleep apnea presents to the outpatient clinic to follow up on her heart failure management. One year prior, echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 30% with an elevated BNP, for which she was started on appropriate GDMT. Repeat echocardiogram today showed an EF of 50%. Which of the following best describes her heart failure status?

A

HFrEF (HF with reduced EF)

B

HFimpEF (HF with improved EF)

C

HFmrEF (HF with mildly reduced EF)

D

HFpEF (HF with preserved EF)

Explanation

The correct answer is B – HFimpEF, or heart failure with improved ejection fraction, best describes her current heart failure status.

Left ventricular ejection fraction is an important factor in classifying heart failure given differences in prognosis, response to treatment, and use in clinical trial enrollment criteria.

The classification of heart failure by EF (adopted from the Universal Definition of HF):

–        HFrEF (HF with reduced EF): LVEF ≤40%

–        HFimpEF (HF with improved EF): previous LVEF ≤40%, a ≥10% increase from baseline LVEF, and a second measurement of LVEF >40%.

–        HFmrEF (HF with mildly reduced EF): LVEF 41%–49%, and
evidence of spontaneous or provokable increased LV filling pressures (e.g., elevated natriuretic peptide, noninvasive and invasive hemodynamic measurement)

–        HFpEF (HF with preserved EF): LVEF ≥50%, and evidence of spontaneous or provokable increased LV filling pressures (e.g., elevated natriuretic peptide, noninvasive and invasive hemodynamic measurement)

Patients with HFmrEF are usually in a dynamic state of improving from HFrEF or deteriorating towards HFrEF. Therefore, patients with HFmrEF may benefit from follow-up evaluation of systolic function and etiology of sub-normal EF.

Improvements in EF are associated with better outcomes but do not indicate full myocardial recovery or normalization of LV function. Indeed, structural and functional abnormalities such as LV dilation and systolic or diastolic dysfunction often persist. Moreover, EF may remain dynamic with fluctuations in either direction depending on factors such as GDMT adherence and re-exposure to cardiotoxic agents. As such, the term heart failure with “improved EF” was deliberately chosen over “recovered EF” and “preserved EF”. Importantly, in patients with HFimpEF while on GDMT, the EF may decrease after withdrawal of GDMT.

Main Takeaway

Classification of Heart failure helps direct and track management.

Guideline Loc.

Section 2.2