

What this term says about where the Supreme Court is headed
16 snips Jun 29, 2025
Greg Stohr, a Supreme Court reporter for Bloomberg News, dives deep into the recent rulings that have shifted the balance of power toward the presidency while curtailing judicial authority. He discusses the implications of significant decisions on birthright citizenship and the new limitations on federal judges' powers. The conversation also explores the dynamics of the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority, focusing on how these changes may shape future legal challenges, voting rights, and the interpretation of the Constitution regarding race.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Nationwide Injunctions Curbed
- The Supreme Court limited lower federal courts from issuing nationwide injunctions that block presidential policies.
- This change complicates legal challenges and could cause patchwork citizenship interpretations across states.
Parents’ Religious Opt-Out Rights
- Parents gained constitutional right to opt children out of lessons conflicting with their religious beliefs.
- Schools will face obstacles presenting content that may conflict with religious views due to opt-out rights.
Court Balances Power Toward Presidency
- The Court generally supports a strong presidency while restraining lower courts.
- The Supreme Court maintains significant power itself, seeing itself as the ultimate arbiter.