Feser's Embarrassingly Bad Arguments Against Platonism | (MoR No. 65)
Sep 10, 2022
21:22
forum Ask episode
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
Ed Feser claims he has "insuperable" arguments against Platonism. He has no such thing.
[ An ever-so-slightly click-baity title; but I don't think it qualifies as clickbait, since it is a perfectly accurate description :) ]
* Correction at 4:57: "Since, obviously, not all of our knowledge of ordinary particulars comes by way of direct causal contact but instead comes by way of indirect causal contact, thereby requiring a transitivity condition."
Majesty of Reason Philosophy Podcast