Sky Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward, and Barbara Hausman-Smith, an attorney with a storied Supreme Court history, dive deep into the challenges facing democracy and civil rights. They reflect on past Supreme Court rulings and the new term's implications, including gun regulation and healthcare discrepancies. Hausman-Smith plans to revisit the Court in her original argument suit, while Perryman discusses legal strategies to combat the conservative legal landscape. Together, they emphasize civic engagement and the crucial role of women in advocating for democracy.
The podcast highlights how far-right judicial movements are strategically undermining democratic principles by circumventing higher courts to restrict rights.
Active citizen engagement, particularly from women, is essential to restoring democratic integrity and ensuring equitable representation in the courts.
Deep dives
The Power of Decision-Making Psychology
Understanding the psychology behind decision-making is crucial to improving the choices we make daily. Behavioral science reveals that many of our decisions are influenced by cognitive biases and social pressures, often leading to irrational choices. For instance, research demonstrates how the 'do-over' effect can help individuals rethink their past decisions, thereby allowing for better future outcomes. By leveraging insights from behavioral science, one can cultivate strategies to enhance decision-making processes and minimize costly mistakes.
The Role of Courts in Democracy
Courts play a fundamental role in upholding democratic values and protecting individual rights. Recent discussions have highlighted the ongoing concerns regarding how judicial decisions can undermine democracy, leading to potential crises of legitimacy. For example, judicial interpretations that favor certain political interests over broader societal needs raise questions about access to justice for all. It is imperative for citizens to actively engage with and understand the court's influence on democracy to maintain a system that works for everyone.
The Challenge of Extreme Judicial Movements
A rising trend in far-right judicial movements poses serious threats to established rights and democratic principles. These movements strategically employ litigation in lower courts to circumvent higher judicial scrutiny, often promoting agendas that restrict access to rights such as reproductive health and labor protections. The organizing efforts behind initiatives like Project 2025 exemplify a coordinated attempt to reshape legal interpretations to benefit a select few, thereby jeopardizing the rights of larger communities. Vigilance in countering these movements is necessary to ensure that the courts serve as tools for justice rather than instruments of oppression.
Mobilizing for Democratic Repair
The pathway to restoring democratic integrity involves active participation from the electorate, particularly women, who have historically led movements for social justice. Engaging with issues at all levels—ranging from local courts to state legislatures—is essential for ensuring equitable representation and accountability. Key to this effort is the need to educate and mobilize citizens about the implications of judicial appointments and legislative actions that affect their rights. By fostering a robust understanding of the democratic process and advocating for meaningful reforms, citizens can contribute to a revitalized democracy that upholds the rights of every individual.
Democracy had a pretty rough ride at the Supreme Court last term. Presidents have criminal immunity now! Agency experts aren’t the experts anymore! Sure, you can convert that rifle into an automatic weapon! And guess what? More horrors await us this term.
But we are not going to spend this last episode before the start of a new term dispassionately picking over a smattering of cases for a lawyerly preview, or helplessly doom spiraling. Instead, we will hear from two women who refuse to blithely accept what the High Court is handing down—two women who have decided to do something, in very different ways.
You’re going to find out why one of these women will head to SCOTUS on Monday in the suit she wore to argue before the High Court 44 years ago. Dahlia Lithwick will ask the other woman, Skye Perryman of Democracy Forward, about the legal theories, doctrine tracking, and litigation strategies her organization is deploying to fight for democracy in the courts –– even (and especially) in courthouses and cases far from One First Street, where until now, the conservative legal movement has had almost free reign. Because any honest preview of the new Supreme Court term needs to look wider and deeper than the handful of cases docketed for the coming weeks.
Want more Amicus? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.