In Moscow's Shadows 162: Lavrov's (Living) Obituary
Sep 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Sergei Lavrov, Russia's Foreign Minister, reflects on his extensive career shaping modern foreign policy. He discusses the evolving challenges he faces amid a shrinking role and the Kremlin's manipulation of his image. The conversation dives into the shifting power dynamics between technocrats and autocrats, exploring the personal and political implications of Lavrov's legacy. Additionally, the moral decline of Russian diplomacy and the credibility crisis stemming from conflicting public statements are examined, highlighting the complexity of international relations today.
Recent polling indicates a rising nationalistic sentiment among Russians, reflecting a shift towards military support and a decline in favor of peace talks.
Lavrov's diminishing influence in foreign policy highlights the Kremlin's consolidation of power and the challenges of seasoned diplomats in an authoritarian regime.
Deep dives
Public Sentiment on Military Action
Recent polls from the Levada Center indicate a shift in public opinion among Russians regarding military action, with support rising from 34% to 41% within one month. Conversely, the percentage of individuals favoring peace talks has dropped from 58% to 50%. This trend suggests an increase in nationalistic sentiments amidst ongoing conflicts, demonstrating a 'rally around the flag' mentality rather than a decline in support for President Putin. These insights reflect the complexities within Russian society, particularly in how public perception can transform during wartime.
Sergei Lavrov's Political Stature
Lavrov, serving as Russia’s Foreign Minister for over 20 years, has seen his political influence significantly diminish despite his long-standing reputation in international diplomacy. Initially regarded as a formidable figure on the global stage, his role has now become largely ceremonial, with little impact on crucial foreign policy decisions, especially after events like the Crimea annexation and the invasion of Ukraine. As a high-profile civil servant with vast experience, his sidelining raises questions about the consolidation of power within the Kremlin and Putin's reluctance to embrace new leadership. This situation exemplifies the limitations placed on seasoned diplomats in Russia's authoritarian framework.
Shifting Dynamics of Diplomacy
The podcast discusses the evolution of Lavrov's diplomatic persona, highlighting how his geniality has been overshadowed by his increasingly difficult role in justifying Russia's foreign actions since 2014. His recent public statements reflect a disconnect with international realities, leading to instances of ridicule from global counterparts. For example, Lavrov's clumsy remarks regarding Ukraine's supposed ties to Nazism underscore the challenges he faces in defending policies he had no hand in deciding. This adaptation to a more confrontational foreign policy climate has strained Lavrov’s credibility among peers, transforming him from a respected diplomat into a reluctant mouthpiece for a more aggressive regime.
The Personal Costs of Political Alignment
Despite Lavrov’s marginalization in decision-making circles, he remains a symbol for the Kremlin, employed to enhance the public perception of the ruling party during elections, notably in his role as a 'locomotive' for United Russia’s campaigns. This utilization signifies how even sidelined officials can be exploited for their public standing to shore up support for existing power structures. Additionally, Lavrov's complex personal life and potential corruption allegations raise questions about the ethics surrounding his and others' substantial lifestyles, juxtaposed against the national narrative of sacrifice for state interests. Ultimately, this illustrates the disconnect between Lavrov's public persona and the hidden intricacies of Russian politics.
Empty rumours of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov's death on the internet yesterday, got me thinking about his shrinking role, and the twilight of Russia's technocrats. Besides, he is already politically dead, so it’s in a way not too early to deliver his obituary and use that to consider some of the dilemmas and characteristics of senior figures who are technocrats, not Putin cronies.
The podcast's corporate partner and sponsor is Conducttr, which provides software for innovative and immersive crisis exercises in hybrid warfare, counter-terrorism, civil affairs and similar situations.
You can also follow my blog, In Moscow's Shadows, and become one of the podcast's supporting Patrons and gain question-asking rights and access to exclusive extra materials right here.