UnCommon Law Loper Bright: How a Little Boat Made Big Waves
May 28, 2025
Dive into the legal tempest surrounding the Chevron doctrine and its potential repeal. Hear about the tug-of-war between Congress and federal agencies, with the plight of fishermen at the center of the debate. The complexities of regulatory interpretation take the spotlight, raising questions about judicial power versus agency authority. Experts share insights on the implications of recent Supreme Court decisions as tensions mount over who gets to interpret the law. Can bureaucrats balance expertise with accountability, or are we opening Pandora’s box?
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Fishermen Challenge Observer Fees
- Atlantic herring fishermen fought new regulations forcing them to pay for government observers to monitor their catch.
- The fishermen believed the National Marine Fisheries Service exceeded its authority with this rule.
Conservatives Oppose Chevron Doctrine
- Conservatives oppose Chevron because it grants federal agencies final authority to interpret ambiguous laws.
- This transfer of power from courts to agencies conflicts with conservative preference for judicial authority.
Chevron Empowers Agencies’ Expertise
- The Chevron Doctrine empowered agencies to interpret and change ambiguous laws using their expertise.
- This influenced how agencies set policies and regulated industries over time.