

The Comey Standard: Justice for All or Just for Some?
May 17, 2025
The discussion focuses on James Comey's controversial comments about President Trump, criticized for their unprofessionalism and potential implications. It examines Joe Biden's use of personal anecdotes to avoid accountability and the media's role in obscuring his cognitive issues. There's a deep dive into the contrasting treatment of Biden and Trump in terms of classified document handling, raising questions about justice and political bias. The conversation highlights the need for transparency in leadership and accountability amidst rising political tensions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Comey's Threatening Instagram Post
- James Comey's Instagram post using "86 47" is widely interpreted as a threat against Donald Trump.
- The phrase means "do away with" and carries serious implications, especially from a former FBI director.
Advocating Equal Justice for All
- Justice should be applied consistently, especially concerning threats to a sitting president.
- If January 6 participants deserve full legal consequences, so should Comey for his threat.
Doubts on Comey's Ignorance Claim
- James Comey's claims of ignorance about the meaning of "86 47" strain credibility.
- If proven false, lying during investigation could lead to obstruction charges.