The Megyn Kelly Show Exclusive Comey Case Details, and Cringe Meghan Markle Profile, with Link Lauren, Eiglarsh, Holloway, and Merchant | Ep. 1198
20 snips
Nov 20, 2025 
Megyn Kelly is joined by Ashleigh Merchant, a trial-experienced legal commentator, Phil Holloway, an experienced trial lawyer, and Mark Eiglarsh, a seasoned attorney with courtroom insights. They discuss exclusive details about the James Comey indictment and the implications of judicial conduct. Other hot topics include Michael Wolff’s controversial Epstein claims and Melania Trump’s potential lawsuit. Later, Link Lauren shares tales from the press pool, exposing the truth behind First and Second Ladies and critiquing Meghan Markle's cringe-worthy profile.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Grand Jury Procedural Drama Could Be Fatal
- The Comey indictment's procedural irregularities dominated courtroom drama and risk derailing the case on technical grounds.
- Mark Eiglarsh reports the full grand jury did approve the two-count indictment and a transcript should cure the dispute.
Vindictiveness Claims Face High Bar
- Defense will argue vindictive prosecution by citing President Trump's public animus toward Comey.
- Phil Holloway says animus alone won't bar prosecution if evidence supports charges and appeals would likely favor the government.
Think Twice Before Reposting Rumors
- Avoid republishing salacious third‑party claims without verification, because repeating "Epstein told me" invites legal trouble.
- Phil Holloway and Mark Eiglarsh advise that defamation suits face high First Amendment hurdles, but discovery can become the objective.
