The Brian Lehrer Show Columbia's Controversial New Definition of Antisemitism
Jul 18, 2025
Arno Rosenfeld, an insightful enterprise reporter at the Forward, and Katie J.M. Baker, an investigative correspondent for The New York Times, dive into Columbia University's controversial new definition of antisemitism. They discuss its political implications and the opposition it faces. The conversation also reveals Project Esther, a Heritage Foundation initiative aimed at countering pro-Palestinian activism, sparking debates over anti-Zionism versus antisemitism. Their analysis touches on the evolving perspectives of younger Jewish communities and the potential consequences of this contentious definition.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why IHRA Definition Is Controversial
- The IHRA definition of antisemitism is brief but controversial due to 11 examples mostly related to Israel.
- It effectively equates anti-Zionism and harsh criticism of Israel with antisemitism, sparking debate.
Debate Over Israel Double Standard
- Claiming Israel is held to a double standard is contentious because the threshold is unclear.
- Critics argue that focusing on Israel's actions is legitimate due to US ties and diaspora communities.
Generational Divide Among Jews
- Younger American Jews are more skeptical or hostile toward Israel than older generations.
- National policy and institutions like Columbia do not reflect this generational divide.