Worse than Futile: What’s Wrong with Using the U.S. Military to Counter Fentanyl
Aug 23, 2023
auto_awesome
Examining proposals to use the U.S. military in countering the fentanyl crisis. Exploring the risks and consequences of militarized approaches. Understanding the rise of fentanyl and its connection to drug prohibition. Discussing the prohibition of test strips and the indictment of the Cinaloa cartel. Exploring the challenges and potential consequences of military intervention in the war on drugs. Highlighting the challenges faced by harm reduction centers. Examining the exponential growth of the overdose crisis and changing drug use trends. Exploring the intersections of drug use, prohibition, and the dangers of the black market.
Proposals to use the US military to counter fentanyl are being debated, including designating cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations and fentanyl precursor chemicals as chemical weapons.
Using the US military in the fight against fentanyl raises concerns about effectiveness, potential consequences, and impact on US-Mexico relations and trade.
Access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder is limited in the US due to regulations, hindering widespread availability and potentially saving lives.
Deep dives
The Fentanyl Crisis in the US
The podcast episode discusses the ongoing fentanyl crisis in the United States. It highlights the alarming number of overdose deaths related to fentanyl, with estimates ranging between 60,000 to 80,000 deaths per year. The episode emphasizes the severity of the crisis and the public's growing concern about the issue. It also delves into the political response to the crisis, with discussion on proposals for using the US military at the border to counter fentanyl. The episode raises concerns about the effectiveness and potential consequences of such proposals.
Proposed Legislation and Legal Aspects
The podcast explores various proposals and legislation related to using the US military to counter fentanyl. It delves into at least three pieces of legislation that have been introduced in Congress, which involve the military's involvement vis-a-vis cartels and fentanyl. The episode specifically mentions the A.O.F. cartel introduced by Representative Dan Crenshaw, which is a broad war authorization resembling the 2001 authorization of the use of military force. It also discusses other measures that explore designating drug trafficking organizations as foreign terrorist organizations or fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction. The episode highlights the potential dangers and implications of such legislation.
Challenges and Concerns
The podcast addresses the challenges and concerns surrounding proposed military interventions and the war on cartels in Mexico. It discusses the complexity of the issue and the varied nature of criminal organizations operating in Mexico. The episode highlights the potential ramifications of military involvement and how it could exacerbate violence, cause mass destruction, and prompt mass refugee movements. It also raises concerns about the impact on US-Mexico relations, trade, and potential involvement of other global players. The episode emphasizes the need to carefully consider the effectiveness and consequences of proposed policies and highlights alternative approaches, such as harm reduction and addressing mental health crises.
The Crackhouse Statute and Overdose Prevention Centers
The podcast discusses the crackhouse statute, a federal law that criminalizes knowingly allowing someone on your premises who is using a controlled substance. It mentions that there are two overdose prevention centers operating in New York that have reversed 1,000 overdoses since November 2021. These centers technically operate against the law, and there are concerns about possible actions from the Justice Department. The suggestion is made to repeal or modify the crackhouse statute to allow state, county, or municipal-sanctioned overdose prevention centers to operate.
The Need for Increased Access to Methadone treatment
The podcast highlights the proven effectiveness of methadone treatment for substance use disorder, with successful implementation in the UK, Canada, and Australia since the 1960s. However, in the United States, access to methadone treatment is hindered by the Controlled Substance Act. It is mentioned that only 400,000 out of an estimated 7-8 million people with opioid use disorder in the US can access methadone treatment. Increasing access to methadone could reduce reliance on the black market and save lives, but the current regulations and limitations hinder widespread availability.
Recent legislation in Congress has proposed designating Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations; pushing the administration to designate fentanyl precursor chemicals as chemical weapons; and even authorizing the use of military force in Mexico. As the fentanyl crisis persists in the United States, several Republican presidential candidates have echoed these calls for using the U.S. military to combat fentanyl. What would these bills and proposals do, practically? What are the likely consequences of using the U.S. military in this way? And what policies hold greater hope of lessening the harm of fentanyl inside the United States? Please join our panel for an examination of these and other pressing questions surrounding proposals for militarizing the drug war at the border. A happy hour reception will follow.