The Sean McDowell Show Substitutionary Atonement Under Fire: William Lane Craig Refutes a New Theory
Nov 20, 2025
William Lane Craig, a renowned philosopher and theologian in Christian apologetics, takes on the critique of penal substitutionary atonement in light of Dr. Andrew R. Rillera's book. Craig dissects Rillera's methodological flaws and emphasizes the biblical significance of animal sacrifices and their role in atonement. He reaffirms the necessity of Jesus' death, exploring concepts of substitution and participation, while arguing for the centrality of these ideas in the gospel narrative. A thought-provoking discussion that challenges modern interpretations!
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Penal Substitution As Central Atonement Facet
- Penal substitutionary atonement teaches Jesus endured the punishment we deserved, removing our liability to punishment.
- William Lane Craig calls it a central facet of the multifaceted biblical doctrine of atonement.
Methodology Undermines Riera's Case
- Craig identifies five pivotal methodological errors in Riera's book that undermine its conclusions.
- Chief among them is treating Old Testament rituals as constraints rather than materials reinterpreted by New Testament authors.
Substitution And Participation Can Coexist
- Riera wrongly treats substitution and participation as mutually exclusive motifs.
- Craig argues Christ can be both representative substitute and the means by which we participate in salvation.
