Lisa Graves from True North Research discusses the influence of the Republican Attorneys General Association, revealing pay-to-play schemes and manipulation in legal and legislative outcomes. The discussion highlights connections to corporate funding, Justice Clarence Thomas, and Leonard Leo's Supreme Court influence. The role of the Rule of Law Defense Fund in election controversy and the impact of state attorneys general on anti-abortion laws are also explored.
RAGA wields significant influence in advancing conservative agendas through legal movements and anti-abortion laws.
RAGA operates with limited oversight, allowing corporate donors pay-to-play access and influencing state attorneys general actions.
RAGA's collaborations with Leonard Leo shape court decisions and impact critical legal issues, illustrating their extensive network.
Deep dives
The Baptist Joint Committee Advocating for Religious Rights
The Baptist Joint Committee, through their podcast, discusses the challenge of protecting the separation of church and state. The podcast is hosted by Amanda Tyler and Holly Holman, Baptist advocates, focusing on topics like Christian nationalism and misuse of religious freedom.
Analysis of Supreme Court Oral Argument on Mr. Bristone Case
The podcast reflects on the recent lengthy oral argument at the Supreme Court regarding the Mr. Bristone case, emphasizing the roles played by Justices Alito and Thomas. The discussion includes the potential implications of the 1873 Comstock Act and the FDA's authority.
The Role of Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA)
The podcast delves into the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA), shedding light on its extensive influence in legal matters across states. RAGA's involvement is explored in various legal movements, including efforts related to anti-abortion laws, election challenges, and support for conservative agendas.
Impact of RAGA on State Attorneys General Accountability
RAGA's impact on state attorneys general's actions and accountability is discussed, highlighting their involvement in advancing conservative agendas and influencing legal proceedings. The podcast exposes how RAGA's network extends to various sectors, including lobbying ties and threats to investigations.
Crossroads of RAGA, Leonard Leo, and Supreme Court Decisions
The podcast uncovers the deep connections between RAGA, Leonard Leo, and significant legal decisions, showcasing how their collaborations shape court decisions and influence critical legal issues. The discussion emphasizes the intricate web of associations shaping the legal landscape.
It’s not quite red-yarn-on-a-corkboard, but given how often we’ve been thinking about the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) over the years, it may as well be. The group has become a vital component of the conservative legal movement, with pay-to-play access afforded to corporate donors to boot. Despite all the money changing hands and obvious conflicts of interest, few have heard of them - and that’s very intentional.
This week we’re joined by Lisa Graves of True North Research to talk about how an organization representing the chief legal officers in half the states in the union has become a national policy juggernaut, pushing legislation and litigation to assist polluters, harm women and LGBTQ families, torment immigrants and even steal elections, all absent any significant oversight or consequences.
In this week’s bonus plus segment, Slate’s very own Mark Joseph Stern joins to discuss coverage of the oral arguments in the mifepristone case (including the hugely significant takeaway most of the analysis missed), and the reasons Neil Gorsuch hates nationwide injunctions.
And finally, following on from last week, thinking about the language we use to describe first trimester abortions.