Evaluating Real-World Adversarial ML Attack Risks and Effective Management: Robustness vs Non-ML Mitigations
Nov 28, 2023
auto_awesome
Speakers discuss concerns of customers and clients regarding security of AI applications and machine learning systems. They explore the distinction between robustness and security in adversarial attacks on ML models. The concept of mitigations in robust ML, including data encryption and secure backups, is discussed. The use of cryptographic signature for data and supply chain validation for data poisoning protection are examined. Techniques of model inversion and differential privacy in adversarial ML are explained. Building effective machine learning models with clear goals is emphasized.
Robust security measures are essential to protect AI applications and machine learning systems, particularly in critical infrastructure and government applications.
Understanding distinct attack vectors and their feasibility helps in assessing risks and developing appropriate mitigation strategies for specific use cases.
Deep dives
The Importance of AI Security and ML Security
The podcast episode delves into the significance of AI security and ML security, particularly in the context of the government's concerns. Adversarial machine learning poses real threats, especially with the involvement of nation states with substantial budgets and motivations to carry out attacks. While not all aspects of adversarial machine learning are practical, certain areas, such as attacks on critical infrastructure and data privacy in government applications, require serious consideration. The discussion emphasizes the need for robust security measures to protect AI applications and machine learning systems, as well as the necessity of distinguishing between robustness and security in developing effective defense strategies.
Identifying Vulnerabilities in AI Applications and Machine Learning Systems
The podcast highlights the vulnerability of AI applications and machine learning systems to different types of attacks. Specifically, poisoning attacks, where attackers manipulate the training data, are identified as challenging but relatively unrealistic in many practical scenarios. Inversion attacks, which involve stealing information from models, are deemed moderately realistic, particularly for perception-based models. Evasion attacks, where attackers manipulate inputs to mislead models, are recognized as more feasible due to the dynamic nature of real-world data. By understanding these distinct attack vectors, organizations can better assess the risks and develop appropriate mitigation strategies for their specific use cases.
Balancing Practicality and Security in Adversarial ML
The podcast explores the trade-off between practicality and security in addressing adversarial machine learning. It notes that while building robust ML models can be challenging, there are alternative mitigations that may be more feasible and cost-effective. These include supply chain validation to prevent poisoning attacks, differential privacy techniques to limit information leakage, and general good practices such as observability, access control, and restriction to counter evasion attacks. The discussion highlights the importance of adopting a multi-perspective approach, involving diverse voices and expertise, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the risks and the development of effective security measures.
Cost-Benefit Analysis in Adversarial ML
The podcast underscores the significance of conducting a cost-benefit analysis when addressing adversarial attacks in ML models. It emphasizes the need to build models with specific objectives in mind and weigh the costs of robustness against the potential impact of attacks. The discussion highlights that different attack vectors, such as poisoning, inversion, and evasion, vary in their practicality and efficacy. By understanding the realistic threat models and evaluating the costs associated with mitigations, organizations can make informed decisions to protect their AI applications and machine learning systems while prioritizing resources effectively.