Why This Nobel Economist Thinks Bitcoin Is Going to Zero, with Eugene Fama
Jan 30, 2025
auto_awesome
Eugene Fama, Nobel Prize-winning economist and 'Father of Modern Finance,' shares his skeptical view on Bitcoin's future, predicting it will plummet to zero in a decade. He discusses the excessive electricity consumption of Bitcoin mining, questioning its sustainability. The conversation touches on the volatility of cryptocurrencies and their implications for banking and the economy. Fama also critiques the evolving perceptions of crypto among high-profile investors and highlights the need for regulation amidst growing distrust in traditional financial institutions.
Eugene Fama argues that Bitcoin's massive energy consumption raises doubts about its sustainability and long-term viability as a currency.
The podcast emphasizes the need for regulation in the cryptocurrency market to protect consumers and address concerns about market manipulation.
Deep dives
The Puzzle of Cryptocurrencies
Cryptocurrencies pose a significant challenge to traditional concepts of money and trading. They operate outside of central authority, relying instead on decentralized networks such as blockchain. Bitcoin, the most well-known cryptocurrency, has become infamous for its environmental impact due to the massive energy consumption required for its operation. This has led to skepticism about its viability as a stable medium of exchange, akin to collectible Beanie Babies that hold value primarily through speculation rather than utility.
Understanding Stablecoins and Meme Coins
Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency designed to minimize volatility by linking their value to traditional assets like the U.S. dollar. This allows for smoother transactions while maintaining a form of stable value, unlike meme coins, which often lack purpose and functionality, leading to their classification as 'shitcoins'. Instances like the Trump coin highlight how speculative investments can mimic collectible trends, which raises questions about their long-term value. The potential for quick profits in these markets often overshadows their instability and lack of intrinsic value.
The Challenge of Economic Theories
Economic models like the efficient market hypothesis suggest that market prices reflect all available information, making it challenging to predict bubbles or sudden crashes. Some critics argue that if cryptocurrencies are expected to be long-term assets, they could redefine monetary theory. However, given their inherent price volatility, there's skepticism about their capability to function as reliable currencies. The conversation raises the necessity for robust economic frameworks to encompass these emerging financial instruments, as failure to adapt could result in significant economic repercussions.
Regulatory Perspectives and Future Implications
The role of regulation in the cryptocurrency space remains contentious, with many arguing that government involvement could stifle innovation while also being a necessary protective measure for consumers. Instances of market manipulation and fraud highlight the need for regulations to safeguard against scams and protect investors. The discussion suggests that if cryptocurrencies collapse, there is a strong likelihood that the government will be pressed to intervene, further intertwining the crypto market with traditional financial systems. As the industry evolves, the impact of lobbying and political influence on the future of cryptocurrency will also be significant in shaping its regulatory landscape.
In December 2024, Bitcoin, one of the earliest cryptocurrencies and undoubtedly the most famous, hit $2 trillion in market capitalization, bigger than Tesla, Meta, and Saudi Aramco. In this episode, Nobel Prize-winning economist and Chicago Booth finance professor Eugene Fama—widely considered the “Father of Modern Finance”—predicts it will go to zero within ten years.
Legendary investor Ray Dalio called crypto a bubble a decade ago; now, he calls it “one hell of an invention.” Larry Fink of BlackRock previously referred to Bitcoin as an index of money laundering. Today, he sees it as “a legitimate financial instrument.” Less than 36 hours after launching his own cryptocurrency before his second inauguration, United States President Donald Trump appeared to have made more than $50 billion on paper for himself and his companies. (During his first term, Trump called crypto “not money, whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air.”) Amidst this noise of crypto doubters changing tune, Fama joins Bethany and Luigi to discuss why he remains dubious about Bitcoin’s ambitions.
Bitcoin uses more electricity than many countries—around 91 terawatt-hours annually. Is this amount unsustainable? What makes its value so volatile, and what are the implications for the banking sector and our economy? If cryptocurrencies’ purpose is a reaction to an underlying distrust in financial institutions, can decentralized blockchain, the technological ledger that enables anonymous crypto exchange, fix it? Last but not least, why do supporters of a decentralized service, whose value lies in its existence outside traditional government structures, need to spend billions in lobbying to convince politicians, including the president, of its utility?