The Sean McDowell Show Is Morality Better Explained By God Or Science? (Sean McDowell vs. Michael Shermer)
Nov 8, 2024
Michael Shermer, the Founding Publisher of Skeptic magazine and a leading advocate for science communication, dives into a compelling debate on the origins of morality. He argues that science can adequately explain moral values without divine input. The discussion ranges from the nature of truth and universal values to the complex interplay between evolution and philosophical thought. Topics like free will, consciousness, and the essence of morality spark intense reflections, challenging listeners to reconsider what shapes our moral compass.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Source of Morality
- Michael Shermer and Sean McDowell agree on objective moral values but disagree on their source.
- Shermer believes they're rooted in human nature, while McDowell sees God as the foundation.
Basis of Human Rights
- Shermer and McDowell agree on individual human rights but differ on their basis.
- Shermer grounds them in human capacity to feel and suffer, while McDowell points to a divine source.
Infant Exposure in Ancient Rome
- Sean McDowell uses the example of infant exposure in ancient Rome to challenge Shermer's view on objective morality.
- He questions how Shermer can judge past practices if morality is based on evolving cultural feelings.
