Alon Pinkas on challenging the idea of Netanyahu as a master strategist of the Middle East
Dec 22, 2024
auto_awesome
In a candid discussion, Alon Pinkas, a senior columnist and former diplomat, critiques Netanyahu’s self-proclaimed status as a master strategist in the Middle East. He argues that Netanyahu's claims about his role in Syria and Iranian power are inflated and disconnected from reality. Pinkas highlights the absurdity of Netanyahu taking credit for military successes, asserting they are due to the Israeli military, not personal strategy. He further suggests Netanyahu’s narrative stems from ‘delusions of grandeur,’ reshaping perceptions of his leadership amid political turmoil.
Alon Pinkas argues that Netanyahu's claim of military achievements, particularly against Hamas and Hezbollah, significantly oversimplifies a complex geopolitical landscape.
The podcast highlights Netanyahu's strategic manipulation of public perception to enhance his political standing amidst ongoing conflicts and judicial changes.
Deep dives
Netanyahu's Strategic Narrative Questioned
A significant claim is made that Prime Minister Netanyahu is attempting to take credit for military achievements that occurred during his tenure, such as the degradation of Hamas and Hezbollah, and the political shift in Syria. However, it is argued that these developments happened independently of his actions and are largely due to other factors and actors. Critics assert that while Netanyahu can celebrate a favorable geopolitical environment for Israel, attributing these successes solely to his leadership presents a misleading narrative. This analysis emphasizes that Netanyahu's portrayal as a master strategist is not entirely deserved, as he failed to actively oppose threats from these groups for years.
Political Maneuvering and Public Perception
Netanyahu is noted to be skilled at manipulating public opinion, rewriting the narrative surrounding the October 7 calamity to regain support that he lost in the fallout. This technique is described as a strategic move to avoid accountability in light of the ongoing war and the failures before that date. The lack of an effective opposition enhances his ability to dominate the political landscape, as the fragmented opposition struggles to form a united front. Consequently, Netanyahu's actions are portrayed as a tactical advantage in bolstering his political standing amidst a public distracted by military conflicts.
Judicial Reforms Amidst Ongoing War
The revival of the controversial judicial overhaul under Netanyahu is linked to his perceived political stability and the absence of a substantial opposition. This context is seen as a prime opportunity for Netanyahu to advance his agenda, as the public’s attention remains diverted towards national security concerns. The delays in government inquiries related to the failures of the October 7 events are interpreted as clever political tactics designed to maintain his grip on power. The discussion suggests that potential actions, such as firing the Attorney General, could provoke renewed public outcry against his government, demonstrating the delicate balance he must navigate.
Haaretz senior columnist and former diplomat Alon Pinkas says that for years, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tacitly supported the continuation of the brutal dictatorship of Bashar Assad in Syria, and it is absurd for him to claim credit for helping to topple Assad’s rule by weakening the mainstays of Iranian power in the region.
“He might as well claim credit for the invasion of Normandy or the fall of the Berlin Wall or the surrender of Japan,” said Pinkas on the Haaretz Podcast. “He had nothing to do with those things. That he decimated Hamas and decapitated or degraded Hezbollah? Absolutely, but the Israeli military did that. That’s the same military he maligned and that he foul-mouthed in the days and weeks following the October 7, 2023 calamity.”
According to Pinkas, Netanyahu is suffering from “delusions of grandeur” in his attempts to convince Israelis and the wider world that he is somehow remaking the Middle East by “cherry-picking successes, ignoring failures and presenting a false narrative.”