Krystal and Ryan discuss the evolution of 'The Squad' as a brand or progressive clique. They also explore their challenges and support for Bernie, the impact of AOC's rise, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the influence of big money on politics.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
AOC and the Squad stood by their principles and voted against a bill that included funding for ICE, despite pressure from party leadership.
AOC and the Squad navigated the fine line between sticking to their progressive principles and compromising to be effective legislators within the Democratic Party.
Internal struggles within progressive organizations can hinder their ability to advocate for progressive policies and maintain cohesive messaging.
Deep dives
The Squad takes a principled stand against funding ICE
During the government shutdown, AOC and the Squad were faced with voting on a bill to fund only the Department of Homeland Security. The bill included no funding for Trump's border wall, but it did allocate some funds for improving conditions for detained migrants. AOC and her team debated whether to vote against the bill, considering their strong stance against ICE. Ultimately, they decided to vote as a bloc and be the only four no votes on the bill. Despite pressure from party leadership, AOC stuck to her principles, even when the bill to reopen the government came up for a vote and included funding for ICE. The vote was draining, but AOC and the Squad stood by their belief that funding ICE was wrong.
The balance between compromise and progressive ideals
AOC and the Squad faced the challenge of balancing their progressive ideals with the need for compromise and getting things done in a Democratic-controlled House. They navigated tough decisions on funding bills and legislation, fighting to push the Democratic Party leftward while also facing pressures to conform and support party lines. Instances like the government shutdown and the debate over ICE funding exemplified the fine line they walked between sticking to their principles and being effective legislators within their party.
The power dynamics within progressive organizations
The book highlights the internal struggles and power dynamics within progressive organizations, such as Sunrise Movement, as they gained influence and navigated within the Democratic Party. Sunrise, for example, experienced internal strife when their influence grew during the crafting of the Biden climate agenda. Internal struggles and power struggles within progressive groups can hinder their ability to effectively advocate for progressive policies and maintain cohesive messaging.
The role of outside pressure and public opinion
AOC and the Squad recognized the importance of outside pressure and public opinion in pushing for progressive change. They understood that being the voices of their constituents meant not just advocating for progressive policies within Congress, but also using their platforms to change public discourse and shift public opinion. They actively engaged with social media and grassroots movements to amplify their message and shape the narrative around key issues like immigration, climate change, and income inequality.
The evolving role of young progressive voters
The book explores the growing influence of young progressive voters and how it shapes the future of progressive politics. Young voters, who are increasingly aligned with progressive values, see politics as a tool for structural change and expect their representatives to be bold and uncompromising in championing their interests. AOC and the Squad's rise to prominence reflects this shift and the potential impact of a new generation of voters who view their politics as normal rather than radical.