The Story INVESTIGATION: Could DNA advances overturn one of Britain's most famous murder cases?
Jan 21, 2026
Emily Dugan, an investigative reporter for The Sunday Times, dives into the haunting 1996 Russell murders that left Britain in shock. She examines Michael Stone’s conviction and enduring claims of his innocence. Dugan discusses the initial investigation, forensic limitations, and the controversial ‘cell confessions’ that formed the core of the prosecution's case. With advances in DNA testing on the horizon, could this lead to a significant miscarriage of justice? Explore the implications for the victims' family and the ongoing quest for justice.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Shock Of A Random Rural Atrocity
- The Russell murders happened in a quiet Kent village and shocked the nation because they seemed random and vicious.
- The lack of obvious motive or suspect amplified public fear and media attention.
Conviction Built On Weak Foundations
- Michael Stone's conviction relied heavily on cell confessions rather than forensic links.
- There was never any forensic evidence directly connecting Stone to the crime scene.
E-Fit From A Mirror Glimpse
- An e-fit from a motorist who glanced at a man's face in her car mirror became the lead for investigators.
- A psychiatrist treating Stone then suggested the e-fit resembled him, focusing police attention on Stone.