Your Brain On Climate
We, with Jonathan Rowson
Dec 29, 2023
Discussing the ambiguous collective term 'we' and its impact on climate conversations, exploring the feasibility of a climate revolution, examining the powerlessness of individuals in the face of the crisis, reflecting on the reluctance to face larger problems, and emphasizing the need for building coalitions for climate action.
43:22
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The term 'we' in climate conversations lacks clarity and specificity, hindering effective communication and action.
- Balancing personal agency with the global scale of the climate crisis is challenging, but building alliances among powerful groups can have a greater impact.
Deep dives
The Ambiguity of the 'We' in Climate Conversations
The speaker discusses the ambiguity of the term 'we' in climate conversations. They highlight how the term is often used to imply collective action but lacks clarity about who exactly is being referred to and what actions they should take. The speaker argues that specifying the 'we' is crucial for effective communication and to avoid the tendency to make vague calls for revolution or systemic change without a clear plan. They emphasize the importance of understanding the various scales at which the 'we' can operate, ranging from global to local levels, and the need for specific actions within those contexts.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
