The Nonlinear Library LW - Which LessWrong/Alignment topics would you like to be tutored in? [Poll] by Ruby
Sep 19, 2024
02:03
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Which LessWrong/Alignment topics would you like to be tutored in? [Poll], published by Ruby on September 19, 2024 on LessWrong.
Would you like to be tutored in applied game theory, natural latents, CFAR-style rationality techniques, "general AI x-risk", Agent Foundations, anthropic
s
, or some
other topics
discussed on LessWrong?
I'm thinking about prototyping some topic-specific LLM tutor bots, and would like to prioritize topics that multiple people are interested in.
Topic-specific LLM tutors would be customized with things like pre-loaded relevant context, helpful system prompts, and more focused testing to ensure they work.
Note: I'm interested in topics that are written about on LessWrong, e.g. infra-bayesianism, and
not
magnetohydrodynamics".
I'm going to use the same poll infrastructure that
Ben Pace pioneered
recently. There is a
thread below
where you add and vote on topics/domains/areas where you might like tutoring.
1. Karma: upvote/downvote to express enthusiasm about there being tutoring for a topic.
2. Reacts: click on the agree react to indicate you personally would like tutoring on a topic.
3. New Poll Option. Add a new topic for people express interest in being tutored on.
For the sake of this poll, I'm more interested in whether you'd like tutoring on a topic or not, separate from the question of whether you think a tutoring bot would be any good. I'll worry about that part.
Background
I've been playing around with LLMs a lot in the past couple of months and so far my favorite use case is tutoring. LLM-assistance is helpful via multiple routes such as providing background context with less effort than external search/reading, keeping me engaged via interactivity, generating examples, and breaking down complex sections into more digestible pieces.
Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org
Would you like to be tutored in applied game theory, natural latents, CFAR-style rationality techniques, "general AI x-risk", Agent Foundations, anthropic
s
, or some
other topics
discussed on LessWrong?
I'm thinking about prototyping some topic-specific LLM tutor bots, and would like to prioritize topics that multiple people are interested in.
Topic-specific LLM tutors would be customized with things like pre-loaded relevant context, helpful system prompts, and more focused testing to ensure they work.
Note: I'm interested in topics that are written about on LessWrong, e.g. infra-bayesianism, and
not
magnetohydrodynamics".
I'm going to use the same poll infrastructure that
Ben Pace pioneered
recently. There is a
thread below
where you add and vote on topics/domains/areas where you might like tutoring.
1. Karma: upvote/downvote to express enthusiasm about there being tutoring for a topic.
2. Reacts: click on the agree react to indicate you personally would like tutoring on a topic.
3. New Poll Option. Add a new topic for people express interest in being tutored on.
For the sake of this poll, I'm more interested in whether you'd like tutoring on a topic or not, separate from the question of whether you think a tutoring bot would be any good. I'll worry about that part.
Background
I've been playing around with LLMs a lot in the past couple of months and so far my favorite use case is tutoring. LLM-assistance is helpful via multiple routes such as providing background context with less effort than external search/reading, keeping me engaged via interactivity, generating examples, and breaking down complex sections into more digestible pieces.
Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org