Philosophy and Science: A Comparative Analysis

The discussion highlights the comparison between philosophy and science, specifically referencing the works of Karl Popper and Emil Lakatos. Popper's assertion that a single counterexample can falsify a scientific theory is challenged, illustrating that philosophical theories do not adhere to the same stringent demands as scientific theories. For instance, the geocentric theory’s gradual complicating modifications, like accounting for observed celestial movements, raises questions about its viability. Ultimately, this points to a subjective judgment in deciding whether to accept or reject a theory, underlining that philosophy often lacks the falsifiability criteria present in scientific disciplines.