Jimmy Akin argues that Mark's Gospel was written within living memory of the events it records and is based on eyewitness testimony. They explore the historical evidence and literary relationship between Mark and Luke, arguing for the reliability of Mark's gospel based on eyewitness testimony and its early composition date in the AD 50s.
Mark's Gospel was written within living memory of the events it records and is based on eyewitness testimony, specifically that of Peter.
The literary relationship between Mark and Luke indicates that Mark was written earlier, likely in the AD 50s, and that Mark's gospel influenced Luke's gospel.
Deep dives
Reliability of Mark's Gospel
One challenge to Mark's gospel is the claim that it is not reliable due to being written long after the events by a non-eyewitness. However, it is defended that Mark was written within living memory of the events it records and is based on eyewitness testimony, particularly that of Peter. The early figure John the Presbitter attests to Mark being the interpreter of Peter who wrote down accurately what he remembered of Jesus' teachings and actions. Additionally, the literary relationship between Mark and Luke suggests that Mark was written earlier than Luke, likely in the AD 50s.
Mark's Gospel and Luke
There is evidence to indicate that Mark's gospel influenced the gospel of Luke. While some scholars argue that Luke used Mark, as Luke acknowledges prior written sources, it is highly probable that Mark relied on the memories of Peter's preaching rather than Luke's gospel. The belief that Luke was written in AD 59 enables us to narrow down the timeframe for Mark's composition, which likely occurred in the AD 50s. Mark's association with Peter only began after he stopped traveling with Paul, an event documented in Acts 15:36-39.
DAY 300
CHALLENGE
“Mark’s Gospel isn’t reliable. It was written long after the events, and by a non-eyewitness.”
DEFENSE
Mark was written within living memory of the events it records, and it’s based on eyewitness testimony.
We elsewhere deal with the fact that Mark wasn’t an eyewitness (see Day 44). Biographies are written all the time by people who aren’t eye- witnesses, and Mark was in an especially good position as a biographer because he based his Gospel on the testimony of an eyewitness: Peter.
Thus the first-century figure John the Presbyter stated:
Mark, having become the inter…
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode