Future Knowledge Music and Copyright in the Era of Taylor Swift
Nov 19, 2025
In this engaging discussion, scholar Michael Menna and law professor Anjali Vats tackle the complexities of music copyright and its impact on fringe musicians. They delve into the disparity between copyright ideals and reality, questioning who truly benefits in the music industry dominated by stars like Taylor Swift. They explore the rise of 360 deals, critique the myth that copyright guarantees creator success, and suggest that focusing on competition could lead to fairer outcomes. Fans can play a pivotal role in supporting independent artists, influencing a shift in the system.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Copyright Helps The Few, Not The Many
- Copyright often benefits a very small set of superstar musicians rather than the broader community of creators.
- Taylor Swift exemplifies how copyright can be leveraged by the privileged, shaping public understanding of copyright's role.
Metrics Hide Alternative Possibilities
- Descriptive economic metrics showing star earnings don't reveal what a fairer music industry could look like without current copyright structures.
- Menna urges considering alternative systems and measuring outcomes beyond narrow IP income statistics.
Rise Of The 360 Deal
- The music industry shifted to 360 deals in the early 2000s, letting labels claim non-copyright revenue like touring and merch.
- This contractual shift concentrated power and reduced musicians' independent income streams.
