Florence Sutcliffe-Braithewaite, scandal researcher, joins the podcast to discuss the shocking Infected Blood Scandal in the UK. They explore the origins of the scandal, the government's role, and the impact on hemophiliac children. The need for truth, compensation, and accountability is emphasized, drawing lessons from the AIDS epidemic. The speakers also reflect on literary texts and share amusing anecdotes.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The British Infected Blood Scandal of the 1970s and 80s resulted in the infection of thousands of hemophiliac patients with HIV and hepatitis C through contaminated blood products, highlighting the role of carelessness, corporate greed, and deliberate human experimentation in exacerbating the scandal.
The podcast draws parallels between the AIDS epidemic and the British Infected Blood Scandal, emphasizing the need for individual stories and testimonies to seek justice, compensation, and closure, while also highlighting the importance of a public inquiry to uncover the truth and hold responsible parties accountable.
Deep dives
The Infected Blood Scandal: A Tale of Medical Malpractice and Negligence
The podcast episode discusses the British Infected Blood Scandal of the 1970s and 80s, where over a thousand hemophiliac patients were infected with HIV and hepatitis through contaminated blood products, leading to the death of three-quarters of the infected patients. The episode explores the revolutionary treatment of factor concentrates, particularly factor eight, which enabled hemophiliacs to prevent bleeds and live pain-free lives. However, these blood products, mainly imported from the US, were contaminated and transmitted deadly diseases. The role of doctors, who continued administering these products despite knowledge of their danger, and the complicity of pharmaceutical companies are highlighted. The government's responsibility, including the decision to import rather than produce the blood products domestically, is also examined. The survivors' fight for justice, the need for a statutory public inquiry, and the importance of compensation and truth-telling are highlighted.
Lessons from the AIDS Epidemic and the Contaminated Blood Scandal
The episode draws parallels between the AIDS epidemic and the British Infected Blood Scandal in terms of government and medical failures, delay in investigations, and the stigmatization of affected communities, including gay men and hemophiliacs. It emphasizes the importance of individual stories and testimonies in bringing attention to historic wrongs and seeking justice. Monetary compensation is considered essential, but equally significant is the need for a public inquiry that uncovers the truth, holds responsible parties accountable, and helps provide closure for the victims. It is suggested that lessons from these crises, including the influence of pharmaceutical companies and the perils of profit over public health, must inform future responses to epidemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Alan Bennett Piece: A Nuanced Examination of Philip Larkin
Renowned playwright and writer Alan Bennett's piece on Andrew Moesen's biography of Philip Larkin is discussed. The episode highlights how Bennett defies expectations by neither fully absolving nor condemning Larkin. Through witty prose and careful analysis, Bennett delves into Larkin's persona, his racist and misogynistic tendencies, and his complicated relationship with fame and domestic life. The piece encapsulates the quintessential LRB approach of engaging critical thinking, nuanced storytelling, and the exploration of complex moral dilemmas. It exemplifies the importance of viewing literary figures and the world with thoughtful introspection, challenging prevailing narratives and celebrating the power of a discerning mind.
The Value of Personal Testimonies and Historical Reckoning
The episode underscores the significance of individual stories and personal testimonies in understanding and addressing historic wrongs. It explores how personal accounts can humanize statistics and evoke empathy. The contaminated blood scandal inquiry, which gathers statements from victims and witnesses, is highlighted as a means of seeking truth, achieving justice, and providing compensation. The discussion also examines the role of memorialization in public memory and sociocultural conversations, reflecting on the lack of a national memorial for the AIDS epidemic and the need for a more comprehensive discourse on past tragedies. In considering the current COVID-19 pandemic, the episode suggests that society must learn from the past and adopt a just approach in order to move forward.
In the 1970s and '80s, thousands of haemophiliacs in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through blood products known to be contaminated. In a recent piece, Florence Sutcliffe-Braithewaite outlines the magnitude of the scandal, exacerbated by carelessness, corporate greed and, in one instance, deliberate human experimentation. She joins Malin to discuss the findings and what they mean for survivors. They are joined by Tom Crewe, who reckoned with the Aids crisis in his 2018 article ‘Here was a plague’.