Why Do Rights-Violating University Officials Get Qualified Immunity?
Sep 15, 2023
auto_awesome
This podcast discusses the issue of qualified immunity for public university officials who violate individuals' free speech rights. It explores the importance of accountability on college campuses and the differences in civil accountability between university administrators and police. The podcast also explores the need to eliminate qualified immunity for university officials and emphasizes the potential impact of holding them liable.
Qualified immunity extends beyond police misconduct to shield university officials from consequences for infringing on free speech rights.
Removing qualified immunity for university officials would incentivize them to better understand and uphold the First Amendment, preventing unnecessary infringements.
Deep dives
The Issue of Qualified Immunity
Qualified immunity, a judicial doctrine that frequently protects police officers from accountability for violating rights, also shields university officials from consequences for infringing on free speech rights. The focus on qualified immunity has primarily been on police, but recent cases involving violations by high school administrators have highlighted the need to examine immunity for other public officials. Qualified immunity, which was originally meant to apply to police misconduct, now extends to government officials in all contexts. Given the Supreme Court's strong record on First Amendment cases, challenging qualified immunity for university officials could lead to better protection of free speech rights on campuses.
The Challenges of Suing Public Universities
When it comes to free speech violations by university officials, it is often challenging to sue the university itself due to sovereign immunity. Instead, individuals must be held accountable by suing them personally. This is where qualified immunity becomes relevant. Contrary to popular belief, qualified immunity is not solely related to police misconduct. The Supreme Court has created a protection that shields government officials, including university administrators, from the consequences of violating constitutional rights. By eliminating qualified immunity for university officials, it would be possible to address the issue of free speech violations more effectively and hold these individuals accountable.
The Need for Accountability and Education
One way to improve free speech on college campuses is to institute accountability for university administrators who violate students' First Amendment rights. Currently, university officials make decisions about which speakers to allow on campus without facing any repercussions. By removing qualified immunity, such officials would have to justify their decisions and potentially face legal consequences if they infringe on constitutional rights. This would incentivize officials to better understand and uphold the First Amendment, preventing unnecessary infringements. Holding university administrators accountable for their actions not only protects free speech but also promotes education and awareness of constitutional rights.
What happens when public university officials violate your free speech rights? Often the get qualified immunity, thus shielding them from consequences of those actions. Casey Mattox with Americans for Prosperity comments.