M. Gessen, a New York Times Opinion writer who witnessed Russia’s drift into autocracy under Putin, discusses alarming parallels with the U.S. political landscape. They highlight outrageous proposals from Trump that reshape democratic boundaries and suggest how trivial conversations overshadow vital issues. Gessen explores voter discontent as a catalyst for supporting disruption of a neglected system and warns of the subtle shift toward authoritarianism driven by executive overreach. Insightful, chilling, and thought-provoking.
M. Gessen emphasizes that seemingly outrageous political narratives can gradually undermine democracy, as seen in both Putin's Russia and Trump's America.
The deep dissatisfaction with the political system has driven some Americans to support Trump, viewing him as a necessary catalyst for change.
Deep dives
Understanding Autocracy Through Historical Context
M. Gessen reflects on their experiences in Russia during the rise of Vladimir Putin, highlighting how initially absurd political narratives can evolve into serious threats to democracy. They recount how Putin targeted LGBT individuals, framing them as threats to national sovereignty, which seemed ridiculous at first but later became a personal danger, leading to Gessen's eventual flight from the country. This mirrors the current political climate under Donald Trump, where irrational ideas, such as the U.S. buying Greenland or permanently acquiring the Gaza Strip, gain traction and reshape public discourse. Gessen argues that these outlandish proposals undermine democratic norms by delegitimizing established law and order, creating a slippery slope toward autocracy.
The Consequences of Political Disengagement
Gessen posits that many Americans voted for Trump due to a deep-seated dissatisfaction with the political system, which they perceive as failing to address their needs. Voters may have seen Trump as a catalyst for change, opting for drastic measures rather than the status quo, which they felt offered no real solutions to their problems. This disillusionment has amplified the dangers of complacency, as businesses and organizations now make decisions that align with Trump’s policies out of a desire for self-preservation. Such actions, while rational in isolation, collectively enable the erosion of democracy by allowing autocratic tendencies to flourish with broad public cooperation.
That's a question prompted by a steady stream of executive orders seeking to consolidate power in the White House and upend long held policies and norms.
New York Times Opinion writer M. Gessen lived through much of Russia's slide into autocracy, and wrote a book about it.
They argue that one of the ways Vladimir Putin consolidated power... was by making a series of arguments that seemed outrageous at the time — like the idea that the LGBT population was a threat to Russian sovereignty.
President Donald Trump's second term has been marked by a string of policy proposals that would have been unthinkable in any other administration.
Even if they don't go anywhere, they're reshaping the boundaries of our democracy.
For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.