Trump's Legal War on Media

Donald Trump's legal battles against the media could potentially escalate to the Supreme Court, particularly as notable figures like Steve Wynn express dissatisfaction with current defamation protections. The longstanding precedent established by the 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan requires public figures to demonstrate actual malice in defamation cases, presenting a high hurdle for those seeking justice against media outlets. Wynn and other prominent individuals argue that this standard is not grounded in the Constitution and should be revisited by the Supreme Court, especially under the influence of the current 6-3 conservative majority. This ongoing dynamic raises critical concerns about the balance of power between the media and those it reports on, highlighting an evolving legal landscape that could reshape defamation laws in America.