New Books Network John Jackson, "Special Advocates in the Adversarial System" (Routledge, 2020)
Nov 14, 2025
Join Emeritus Professor John Jackson, a leader in comparative criminal law, as he explores the critical role of Special Advocates in closed trials. He reveals how these advocates represent excluded parties while navigating ethical dilemmas and accountability gaps. Jackson shares insights on international models, including their use in countries like Canada and Australia. Delving into influences from human rights rulings and challenges in the adversarial system, he highlights the complexities and implications for justice.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Firsthand Stormont Parole Hearing
- John Jackson describes being taken to Stormont to read intelligence material with phones confiscated and no notes allowed.
- He then observed a parole hearing where a special advocate examined closed evidence while the prisoner and counsel were excluded.
Closed Cross-Examination Behind Screens
- Jackson recounts the special advocate entering closed sessions to cross-examine security agents behind screens while the prisoner and counsel were excluded.
- The tribunal produced an open judgment and a sealed closed judgment that the prisoner could not read.
Secrecy Creates A Kafkaesque Limbo
- Closed procedures remove openness and leave appellants unaware of the case against them, producing a Kafkaesque limbo.
- That secrecy undermines due process and public visibility of justice.
