You may already know my position on MTBF. If not, in short, do not use MTBF at all, ever, in any form. So what should we use instead.

While the NoMTBF movement is progressing, we still find those who want to use MTBF (or MTTF). As you know, MTxx-type metrics are means. They contain little information and are generally misunderstood and misused. So, what should a well-educated practitioner do?
Let's discuss a few ways you can and should respond to requests for MTBF. How to ask vendors, or anyone, for reliability information by not asking for nor accepting MTBF. Plus, let's brainstorm and outline a few steps each of us can do tomorrow and every day to minimize the misuse of MTBF and related measures.
This Accendo Reliability webinar originally broadcast on 9 June 2020.
To view the recorded video/audio of the event, visit the webinar page.
How to Talk About MTBF episode
The Evil Ways of MTBF with Fred Schenkelberg episode
Only have MTBFs episode
Vendor MTBF Claim episode
MTBF, Reliability, and the Curve episode
You may already know my position on MTBF. If not, in short, do not use MTBF at all, ever, in any form. So what should we use instead.
what specific steps you can take to help your customer actually use your the stated reliability goal and not MTBF.
No time to understand MTBF, and your organization relies on the reliability of its products, you are almost certainly in trouble.
The proper and improver responses to someone asking about or requesting MTBF information. Some to avoid and some to use regularly.
If you want to learn more about MTBF testing and how it might (or might not) work then view this recording.
This morning's email included a question on why I was so against using MTBF. This episode is my answer and why one should avoid MTBF
The Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) appears in lots of textbooks and standards, so it must be really important right? Well, not really.
The post What to Do About MTBF Use appeared first on Accendo Reliability.