221: The Dangers of Dr Google (w/Dr Jonathan Stea)
Aug 29, 2024
auto_awesome
Dr. Jonathan Stea, a mental health expert specializing in technology's impact on well-being, joins the discussion on the rising trend of online mental health advice. They explore the risks of misinformation, especially among young people, and the ethical dilemmas faced by professionals combating false narratives. Stea emphasizes the importance of informed science communication to help navigate the wellness industry and its pitfalls, while also sharing insights from his new book, which tackles these pressing challenges head-on.
A significant proportion of young adults rely on the internet for mental health advice, highlighting the risks of misinformation and lack of professional guidance.
The influence of prominent public figures on societal perceptions of psychiatric treatments can undermine evidence-based mental health care and perpetuate stigma.
Improving science literacy is essential to counteract misinformation in mental health discussions, empowering individuals to make informed decisions about their well-being.
Deep dives
The Dangers of Misinformation on Medications
Misinformation surrounding psychiatric medications, such as antidepressants, can have harmful effects on decision-making and public perception. Influential figures like Elon Musk make bold claims that these medications are more harmful than helpful, which can misguide many people. Such statements, often repeated in popular culture, create a false narrative that undermines the medical community's understanding of these treatments. Clinical professionals emphasize that while psychiatric medications are not a singular solution, they serve as vital components in a broader therapeutic strategy.
The Shift Towards Online Mental Health Advice
A significant number of individuals, especially young adults, seek mental health advice from internet sources, tapping into social media for guidance. Surveys indicate that many prefer these platforms over traditional consultations with mental health professionals. While the internet can offer community support, it also poses risks, as misinformation can dominate online discussions. The conversation highlights the necessity for credible sources and the challenges in maintaining accurate mental health discourse in the digital age.
The Impact of Public Figures on Mental Health Discussions
Prominent public figures, when they express unsupported opinions about mental health, can heavily influence societal views and stigmas. When they dismiss the effectiveness of treatments like SSRIs, their vast follower base may accept these notions without questioning them. This dynamic poses challenges for mental health professionals who strive to provide evidence-based care amidst the spread of these views. It exemplifies the critical interplay between media influence and public perception of mental health treatments.
Neurodiversity and Its Representation in Media
The recent public display of emotion from a neurodivergent youth during a political event sparked both admiration and criticism, illustrating society's varying responses to expressions of vulnerability. Despite some backlash from conservative commentators attempting to shame the emotional moment, this incident shed light on the importance of positive representations of neurodiversity in the media. The event became an empowering message for families with neurodivergent members, emphasizing acceptance and love. It underscored the shifting narrative around neurodivergence, advocating for understanding and respect rather than derision.
Navigating the Misinformation Landscape
The prevalence of poor science literacy contributes to the spread of misinformation regarding mental health and treatment options, making it crucial to address this knowledge gap. Experts stress that understanding the complexities of mental health is essential to combat misconceptions perpetuated by social media and influential voices. With the ongoing evolution of public awareness, it is vital to foster science literacy from early education into adulthood. This focus on knowledge can empower individuals to critically evaluate health information and make informed decisions regarding their mental well-being.
In one survey, 82% of young people aged 18-25 searched the internet for mental health advice. Another survey of university students found that 44% report using the internet to learn about sadness, anxiety, or confusion. Regardless of what mental health experts advise, people of all age groups are turning to the internet and social media for help.
What are the potential risks and rewards of using these platforms to try to communicate credible mental health science? And what happens when you’re endlessly trolled for being a “Big Pharma shill,” even when you don’t have prescriptive powers and only offer talk therapy in your clinical practice?
Clinical psychologist Jonathan Stea joins us to discuss these difficult questions. His new book, Mind the Science: Saving Your Mental Health from the Wellness Industry, is a field guide that responds to some of the intense challenges earnest seekers face when trying to navigate waters filled with supplements-slinging sharks who believe they can diagnose mental health conditions with zero training.