#12099 How Does Aristotle’s Philosophy Explain Transubstantiation?

05:09 – If someone venially sins in a category that is grave by nature, has one committed a grave offense that he’s only venially culpable for? If so, does one have a similar responsibility to avoid such sins like mortal sins?

08:16 – What is the meaning of Genesis 49:14-15?

13:43 – What is considered a grave reason to use NFP to avoid pregnancy? Would it be a sin to avoid pregnancy for a less than grave reason?

15:10 – Was Yahweh tempted in the desert when Jesus was tempted in the desert?

18:32 – Does the Prime Directive in Star Trek go against Catholic theology?

23:27 – Having been baptized in a different faith, I’m getting ready for my First Reconciliation; could I bring in a list of my sins, or should I confess what’s on my heart?

29:40 – Can you help me understand how recent immigration changes will affect priests from other countries?

34:34 – Is there a good book a Lapsed Catholic could read to relearn all the traditions? Should I go back to confession?

43:23 – I’m an Extraordinary Eucharistic Minister. Can non-Catholics Christians receive ashes on Ash Wednesday?

45:16 – How does Aristotle’s distinction between substance and accidents help explain the concept of transubstantiation?

48:13 – Why is there a response to “The Mystery of the Faith/Mysterium fidei” that doesn’t mention the Resurrection?

51:48 – The Catechism says temporal punishment doesn’t remain after Confession, but my Catechist says otherwise. Who is right?

#12099 How Does Aristotle’s Philosophy Explain Transubstantiation? - Jimmy Akin