Peter Joshua Atkins, "The Animalising Affliction of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4: Reading Across the Human-Animal Boundary" (Bloomsbury, 2022)
Oct 16, 2024
auto_awesome
Peter Joshua Atkins, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Edinburgh and author of 'The Animalising Affliction of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4,' dives into the intriguing nature of Nebuchadnezzar's transformation. He discusses the tension between metamorphosis and the human-animal boundary, exploring ancient Mesopotamian texts. Atkins challenges traditional interpretations of Daniel 4, highlighting the significance of divine wisdom. He also connects themes of mental health and ecological implications in the Hebrew Bible, revealing unexpected insights about humanity's relationship with animals.
Peter Atkins emphasizes the complexity of the human-animal boundary in Daniel 4, challenging traditional interpretations of Nebuchadnezzar's affliction.
The podcast highlights contrasting cultural interpretations of suffering and divinity as seen in the narratives of Nebuchadnezzar and Nabonidus.
Deep dives
New Features of the Network
The podcast highlights improvements on the New Books Network website, particularly the introduction of a more efficient search engine. This feature allows users to quickly find episodes related to specific keywords, enhancing overall accessibility. Additionally, a new listener account function enables users to save episodes for later, facilitating personalized listening experiences. These enhancements aim to improve user engagement and streamline the search process for interested listeners.
Dr. Peter Joshua Atkins and His Journey
Dr. Peter Joshua Atkins shares insights into his background and academic journey leading up to his current research focus. Growing up in England, he was exposed to the Church of England and biblical stories, which piqued his interest in biblical studies during his school years. His formative experiences and dissatisfaction with philosophical approaches to religion drove him to engage deeply with biblical texts, ultimately studying at the University of Sheffield. This academic path significantly influenced his scholarly work and led to the production of his recent book.
Exploring Human-Animal Boundaries
Atkins discusses the central themes of his book, particularly the human-animal boundary as illustrated in the story of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4. His examination addresses what differentiates humans from animals, raising critical questions about humanity’s perceived superiority. Through Nebuchadnezzar’s transformation, the text explores the nuances of this boundary, challenging readers to rethink their assumptions regarding human identity and animality. The narrative serves not only as a case study but also as a catalyst for broader discussions on the nature of existence.
Intertextual Connections and Insights
The podcast delves into various related texts, such as the Prayer of Nabonidus and the Vitae Danielis, which provide additional context and contrasts to the Daniel 4 narrative. The Prayer recounts the affliction of Nabonidus and includes parallels with Nebuchadnezzar's story but lacks animal imagery, highlighting differing cultural interpretations of suffering and divinity. The Vitae Danielis presents a transformed Nebuchadnezzar as a hybrid creature, illustrating a unique interpretation of the king’s affliction. Together, these texts enrich the understanding of how later interpretations of the biblical narrative evolved within different historical contexts.
The Animalising Affliction of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4: Reading Across the Human-Animal Boundary(Bloomsbury, 2022) is a detailed investigation into the nature of Nebuchadnezzar's animalising affliction in Daniel 4 and the degree to which he is depicted as actually becoming an animal. Peter Atkins examines two predominant lines of interpretation: either Nebuchadnezzar undergoes a physical metamorphosis of some kind into an animal form; or diverse other readings that specifically preclude or deny an animal transformation of the king. By providing an extensive study of these interpretative opinions, alongside innovative assessments of ancient Mesopotamian divine-human-animal boundaries, Atkins ultimately demonstrates how neither of these traditional interpretations best reflect the narrative events.
While there have been numerous metamorphic interpretations of Daniel 4, these are largely reliant upon later developments within the textual tradition and are not present in the earliest edition of Nebuchadnezzar's animalising affliction. Atkins' study displays that when Daniel 4 is read in the context of Mesopotamian texts, which appear to conceive of the human-animal boundary as being indicated primarily in relation to possession or lack of the divine characteristic of wisdom, the affliction represents a far more significant categorical change from human to animal than has hitherto been identified.