BONUS POD: Trump Was Negotiating While the Media Was Lying
whatshot 7 snips
Jan 22, 2026
The discussion uncovers a proposed framework deal for Greenland and the Arctic, emphasizing long-term diplomatic goals over military action. The speakers highlight the strategic importance of the region in curbing Russian and Chinese influence. Trump’s use of tariffs as a negotiation tactic is explored, showcasing how diplomatic pressure led to a successful outcome. Additionally, criticism of media narratives around potential invasion and a call for a 'Board of Peace' as an alternative to the UN adds depth to the analysis.
14:52
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Davos Yielded A Greenland-Arctic Framework
Ben Ferguson highlights a diplomatic framework reached for Greenland and the Arctic after Davos talks.
He frames the outcome as proof that negotiation, not invasion, resolved tensions with allies.
insights INSIGHT
Tariffs Used And Then Withdrawn As Leverage
Donald Trump said tariff threats were withdrawn after reaching a concept of a deal.
Ben Ferguson presents the tariff pause as leverage that produced diplomatic progress.
insights INSIGHT
Arctic Strategy Targets Russian And Chinese Influence
Ben Ferguson argues the Greenland/Arctic move aims to limit Russian and Chinese influence.
He presents Arctic control as a strategic national-security priority for the U.S. and NATO.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
President Trump announced a framework for a future agreement involving Greenland and the broader Arctic region, reached through discussions with NATO leadership and U.S. allies.
This is not a military action or invasion, but a diplomatic and security-oriented arrangement still under development.
The deal is framed as long‑term (“forever”), contrasting it with past time‑limited international agreements.
2. Focus on Arctic Security and Strategic Competition
The core justification presented is national and allied security, particularly limiting Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic.
China’s has a stated interest in Arctic dominance and the deal is preemptive containment.
Greenland is described as strategically important due to geography, security positioning, and mineral resources.
3. Denial of Military Intent
A central theme is the explicit rejection of military force as a means of acquiring Greenland.
Claims of potential invasion were misinformation spread by media and political opponents.
Trump is quoted as saying military action would not be necessary.
4. Use of Economic Leverage (Tariffs)
Trump used tariff threats against European allies as negotiating leverage.
The subsequent removal of tariff threats is evidence that diplomacy succeeded.
This approach is intentional pressure rather than economic aggression.
5. Rejection of Media and Democratic Narratives
Predicting war or invasion
Mischaracterizing Trump’s intentions
Ignoring diplomatic outcomes
6. Introduction of a “Board of Peace” Concept
Separate from Greenland, the document introduces Trump’s idea to create a “Board of Peace”.
This proposed body is an alternative or supplement to the United Nations, which is ineffective.
7. Critique of the United Nations
The UN has had historical failures in:
Rwanda
Syria
China’s treatment of Uyghurs
Iran’s protest crackdowns
Myanmar
Sudan
Veto power and authoritarian influence render the UN ineffective.
We need a new peace mechanism under U.S. leadership.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
Verdict with Ted Cruz