Tesla Attacks, Weird Walz Comments, and Judges Keep Fighting Trump, with Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cooke | Ep. 1030
Mar 19, 2025
auto_awesome
Rich Lowry, Editor-in-chief of National Review, and Charles C.W. Cooke, Senior editor at National Review, delve into the legal challenges facing Trump, including a controversial judge’s ruling on his transgender military ban. They discuss judicial overreach and how political implications play out in Trump’s legal battles. Vandalism against Tesla is highlighted, underscoring the societal reactions to political figures. The conversation also critiques bizarre comments from Governor Tim Walz regarding masculinity and the climate debate, showcasing the tension between cultural narratives and politics.
The podcast discusses the implications of a district judge's ruling that prioritizes social progress over military readiness, raising concerns about executive authority.
Participants express optimism regarding Trump's potential legal victories in the Supreme Court, viewing the current legal battles as strategic attacks on presidential power.
The conversation critiques aggressive political rhetoric, particularly from figures like Tim Walz, emphasizing its potential to alienate specific voter demographics.
Criticism of CNN's Bill Weir highlights the need for balanced journalism in environmental reporting, reflecting a larger challenge in media narratives.
Deep dives
Importance of Education Savings
iSave 529 highlights that funding can be utilized for various educational purposes, including K-12 tuition and trade school expenditures. This financial resource helps families plan for their children's futures by alleviating the burden of educational costs. Additionally, it enables families to save for college or repay student loans. The initiative promotes the idea that there are no limits to how education funding can empower children to pursue their dreams.
Legal Challenges Against Trump
There is a significant focus on the ongoing legal battles surrounding Donald Trump's presidency. Legal actions are being used strategically to attempt to undermine his political agenda, with opponents leveraging the judicial system to stymie his initiatives. The discussion emphasizes how judges appointed by previous Democratic administrations are playing a role in these legal challenges, which sparks concerns over judicial impartiality. The intention behind these legal maneuvers seems to aim at interfering with presidential authority over the military and other executive functions.
Military Inclusion and Judicial Overreach
The discussion includes a contentious ruling regarding transgender individuals and military service, which advocates for inclusive policies contrary to traditional military standards. Critics argue that the ruling undermines the commander-in-chief's authority and could diminish military effectiveness. There’s a sharp critique of the judge's opinion, which appears to prioritize social progress over military readiness, raising questions about the long-term implications for the armed forces. This highlights the broader cultural clash surrounding military policies and the impact of judicial decisions on governmental power.
The Pushback Against Lawfare
Participants discuss lawfare as a tactic used to criminalize and disempower political opponents, specifically targeting Trump and his allies. The conversation recognizes the importance of defending executive power and the constitutional authority granted to the president. There is a shared conviction that the resilience and tradition of the presidency must prevail against these strategic legal assaults. As a result, there is optimism regarding the ultimate outcomes of these legal disputes within the Supreme Court.
Polarizing Political Rhetoric
There is concern about the increasing use of aggressive language and imagery in political discourse among leaders like Tim Walz, who professes he could physically confront political adversaries. Such remarks are viewed as indicative of deeper tensions within the political landscape that alienate specific voter demographics. The discussion points to a broader issue of how political figures engage with constituents, particularly young men, and the implications of this rhetoric on public sentiment. Observing how these statements resonate or repel voters becomes crucial as political campaigns shape up for future elections.
Media Bias in Environmental Reporting
The segment critiques CNN's Bill Weir for his biased reporting related to environmental issues and his apparent lack of balance when covering Trump's environmental policies. The criticism hinges on a specific instance where Weir mischaracterizes Trump-era actions as harmful without providing a comprehensive view of alternatives or outcomes. This reflects a broader challenge in the media landscape where environmental narratives often lean towards alarmism rather than factual reporting. The error underscores the need for accountability in journalism and highlights the ongoing fight for sound environmental policies.
Polarization of American Society
In reflecting on Chuck Schumer's comments, the conversation highlights a growing divide in American society informed by elite perspectives that dismiss the concerns of productive individuals and entrepreneurs. Schumer’s rhetoric suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of government and the value of capitalism, emphasizing punitive taxation and regulation. This narrative could further alienate important voter bases, particularly small business owners and financially successful individuals. The discourse invites a necessary conversation about clearly aligning government policies with the realities faced by everyday Americans.
Megyn Kelly is joined by National Review's Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cooke to discuss a woke district judge who blocked Trump’s transgender military ban, the judge's focus on feelings and opinion over law, why Trump will eventually win in the Supreme Court, the gender insanity among leftists in America still, what could be motivating the judge who blocked Trump’s Venezuelan gang deportations, an overview of the Alien Enemies Act and the Political Question Doctrine, whether the Trump administration needs to wait to make the legal case first, Chief Justice Roberts taking a swipe at Trump, his rare public statement rebuking Trump’s call for the impeachment of a judge, Mahmoud Khalil complaining about the cold and being a “political prisoner” in his detention facility, his call for more protests in support of him, the anti-Trump and anti-Elon Tesla vandalism in America, the left trying to downplay the violence, Tim Walz's absurd and ridiculous comments about Trump-supporting men, CNN climate journalist Bill Weir’s embarrassing mistake about the EPA, how he’s actually an unhinged climate activist, and more.
Home Title Lock: Sign up at https://www.hometitlelock.com/MegynKelly and use promo code MEGYN250 for a FREE title history report AND access to your Personal Title Expert —a $250 value! Check out the Million Dollar TripleLock Protection details when you get there! Exclusions apply. For details visit https://www.hometitlelock.com/warranty
Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly
Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow
Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow
Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow
Find out more information at:
https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
