

The Battle for Due Process: Migrants and the Law
Apr 16, 2025
Discussion centers on the contentious battle over due process for illegal immigrants, examining the impracticalities of handling millions of cases. The critique of judicial bias from Democrat-appointed judges comes into play, alongside the chaotic situation at the border concerning drug smuggling and family issues. Tension also emerges around political figures engaging with foreign gangs and the risks of Iran attaining nuclear capabilities, questioning diplomatic approaches to national security. Media biases in immigration coverage highlight broader societal implications, raising alarms over the interpretation of American values.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Eisenhower's Deportations
- Mark Levin notes that there wasn't much discussion about due process when Eisenhower deported 1.3 million Mexicans and Mexican-Americans.
- This happened within a six-month period, with little regard for legal procedures.
Korematsu v. United States
- The Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States (1944) upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII.
- Justice Hugo Black argued that national security outweighed individual rights, a decision now viewed as racist.
Cloward-Piven on Immigration
- Mark Levin argues that the current demand for due process for illegal immigrants is a Cloward-Piven strategy.
- The goal is to overwhelm the system, making it impossible to enforce immigration laws effectively.