Why the nation’s largest power market wants to stop paying for energy efficiency
Sep 19, 2024
auto_awesome
Catherine Morehouse, an energy reporter for POLITICO, delves into the controversial proposal from PJM Interconnection to halt payments for energy efficiency initiatives. She discusses the implications of this shift for clean energy advocates and the potential risks it poses to energy-saving goals. The conversation also touches on a new Treasury Department rule that offers tax credits for electric vehicle charging stations in low-income and rural areas, highlighting ongoing efforts to bolster sustainable energy infrastructure.
PJM Interconnection's proposal to stop payments for energy efficiency initiatives has sparked controversy among clean energy advocates concerned about its impact on consumer behavior.
The Treasury Department's rule on tax credits for electric vehicle charging stations aims to enhance access in low-income and rural areas, supporting a transition to cleaner energy.
Deep dives
Proposed Changes to Energy Efficiency Payments
PJM Interconnection is proposing to end capacity market payments for energy efficiency initiatives, a move that has stirred controversy among clean energy advocates. This change, requested with the justification of two complaints from the Independent Market Monitor, suggests that the payments made to companies for energy efficiency do not directly correlate with actual reductions in energy consumption. Previously, these payments had been significant, amounting to over $100 million annually since 2018, but critics argue that they are essentially compensating companies for simply tracking appliance sales rather than driving actual consumer behavior. The proposal marks a significant shift in how energy efficiency is valued in the market, moving away from a practice in place for the last 15 years.
Response from Clean Energy Advocates
Environmentalists and clean energy proponents are expressing concerns over PJM's abrupt decision to cut payments for energy efficiency programs. They acknowledge the need for improved data and transparency in the efficiency policies but argue that eliminating payments outright may undermine long-term efforts to integrate energy-efficient technologies into the energy mix. Advocates emphasize that reducing energy consumption is crucial for displacing polluting energy sources and lowering costs for consumers. They are also urging FERC to engage in a broader discussion about effectively utilizing energy efficiency resources in response to rising demand and supply constraints, stressing the risks of removing such resources from capacity markets.
The nation’s largest power market, PJM Interconnection, is proposing to stop payments for energy efficiency initiatives, which are meant to encourage households and businesses to use less power. POLITICO’s Catherine Morehouse breaks down PJM’s proposal, how FERC is involved, and why clean energy advocates aren’t thrilled. Plus, the Treasury Department is proposing a rule implementing a potentially lucrative tax credit that could cover nearly a third of the cost for businesses and individuals installing electric vehicle charging stations in low-income and rural areas.