George Conway Explains It All (To Sarah Longwell)
S2 Ep105: “The Level of Stupid is Just Tremendous”
Apr 10, 2025
The conversation dives into a landmark Supreme Court ruling affirming due process for those detained under the Alien Enemies Act. The ethical implications of a DOJ attorney's punishment for honesty in a wrongful imprisonment case reveal troubling dynamics. They dissect Trump’s recent executive orders targeting a law firm involved in contentious litigation, shedding light on political manipulation in the legal arena. Additionally, discussions on accountability and the chilling effects of retribution against former officials highlight a disturbing trend in governance.
48:50
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court ruling affirms due process rights for detainees under the Alien Enemies Act, countering previous administration positions.
- Disciplinary actions against a DOJ attorney reveal a troubling trend of suppressing truthful disclosures that contradict administrative narratives.
Deep dives
The Alien Enemies Act and Supreme Court Decisions
The podcast discusses a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the Alien Enemies Act, which requires detainees to challenge their removal via habeas petition rather than the more common Administrative Procedure Act. This decision revealed that while the Trump administration may portray the ruling as a victory, it underscores the necessity for due process rights for individuals facing deportation under this act. Notably, all justices acknowledged that deportees are entitled to notice before removal, directly countering the administration's previous stance. However, the ruling leaves unclear how future challenges will proceed, highlighting potential difficulties for those seeking relief in potentially unfavorable jurisdictions.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
