An Overbroad Federal Swipe at 'Gamified' Investing
Oct 5, 2023
auto_awesome
SEC's worries about the gamification of investing and proposed federal regulations. Lack of consideration for accessibility and availability of new investing forms. Concerns about AI and conflicts of interest in the industry.
The SEC's proposed rules aim to address concerns about the gamification of investing and the potential negative impact of new technology on investor understanding and decision-making.
Critics argue that the SEC underestimates investors and overestimates technology, as investors have different motivations and trading strategies, and the proposed rules may restrict accessibility and increase costs.
Deep dives
SEC's Proposal to Regulate Technology in Investing
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rules to address concerns about the gamification of investing and the potential negative impact of new technology, including AI, on the investor-broker relationship. The SEC believes that flashy technology might make investors trade more than they intend to or not fully understand the consequences of trading. However, critics argue that the SEC underestimates investors and overestimates technology, as investors have different motivations and trading strategies. The proposed rules cover a wide range of technologies, including basic tools like Excel spreadsheets, bringing into question the distinction between cutting-edge technologies and more familiar ones.
The Impact of Technology on Investor-Broker Relationship
The SEC's proposed rules focus on predictive data analytics and view technology, such as AI and deep learning, as game changers in how individuals interact with investment platforms and advisors. The SEC argues that investors may become incapable of digesting disclosures and making informed decisions due to the scale and scope of technology. However, critics contend that the SEC fails to balance the benefits of making investing more accessible and exciting with the proposed rules' potential increase in costs and limitations on technology use. Additionally, the SEC's assumption that analytics and personalized recommendations are inherently nefarious overlooks potential efficiency gains and alignment with investor preferences.
New tech threatens the ability for investors to understand what they're doing, or so the leaders of the SEC seem to believe. But what would their proposed federal regulations do to change that? Jack Solowey and Jennifer Schulp comment.