Mises Institute Calhoun’s Doctrine of the Concurrent Majority
Jan 6, 2026
Explore John C. Calhoun's doctrine of the concurrent majority, designed to curb majority tyranny and protect minority rights. Uncover how constitutions should limit power rather than simply grant it. Delve into the concept of negative powers and vetoes as essential checks on government. Learn how minority pressures foster compromise, preventing the overreach of the majority. The discussion touches on historical concerns of democratic tyranny and illustrates with modern examples, emphasizing the significance of this doctrine in promoting social cooperation and individual liberty.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Constitution As A Restraint
- John C. Calhoun argued constitutions must restrain, not just confer, government power.
- He claimed a negative power (veto/nullification) is essential to any real constitution.
Concurrent Majority Limits Majority Tyranny
- The concurrent majority grants sectional minorities a veto-like power to block oppressive majority action.
- Calhoun believed this check enlarges liberty by preventing majority tyranny.
Minority Protection As Liberty Safeguard
- Calhoun framed minority protection as vital to individual liberty rather than mere sectional advantage.
- He argued safeguarding minorities prevents democratic majorities from becoming as arbitrary as monarchs.
