Notes To My (Legal) Self
Season 6, Episode 17: Florida v. California (with Kassi Burns and Olga V. Mack)
Dec 29, 2023
Attorney and AI expert, Kassi Burns, discusses the contrasting AI ethics approaches in Florida and California. They delve into the potential of generative AI for law practice, emphasizing the importance of active learning and practical experimentation. The chapter also highlights the hope for alignment among states regarding technology competency guidelines in the legal profession.
49:41
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- California's approach to AI in the practice of law emphasizes innovation and access to justice, while Florida takes a more cautious approach focusing on client confidentiality and ethics.
- Embracing AI in their practice can lead to increased efficiency and improved client services for individual practitioners.
Deep dives
Approaches in California and Florida to AI and the Practice of Law
California and Florida are taking different approaches to AI in the practice of law. California emphasizes innovation and access to justice, recognizing the potential for AI to transform the legal profession. They propose requirements for generative AI training and highlight the need for law schools to adapt to technological advancements. On the other hand, Florida takes a more cautious approach, focusing on client confidentiality and ethics. They prioritize protecting clients and being mindful of potential biases in AI. The guidelines are open for public comments in both states, allowing for input and potentially shaping the future of AI in law.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
